On April 21, a California judge ruled in favor of Finnegan client Asetek, deciding that two of their patents weren’t invalid for obviousness. In 2013, Asetek filed suit against CMI USA Inc. accusing CMI’s liquid cooling system for computers of infringing two Asetek patents. CMI claimed that the patents were obvious based on prior art and therefore invalid. In December 2014, a jury found that CMI’s cooling system infringed one of the patents and awarded nearly $405,000 in damages to Asetek.
Commentary
April 11, 2024
Media Mention
Women in Business Law Americas Awards 2024: Three Finnegan Attorneys Shortlisted
April 7, 2024
Press Release
Finnegan and BMW Group Successfully Demolish Non-Practicing Entity NorthStar’s Efforts
April 3, 2024
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.