June 2, 2014
On June 2, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc., determining “the phrases ‘amenable to construction’ and ‘insolubly ambiguous’ for purposes of identifying an indefinite patent claim are ’lack precision’.” Finnegan partner James R. Barney said, “All patents in all areas of technology could be susceptible to indefiniteness challenges depending on how the Federal Circuit applies the new Nautilus test.”
Press Release
September 11, 2024
Announcement
Finnegan and Partner Daniel Chung Recognized by The National Law Journal
September 3, 2024
Press Release
Finnegan Named a “True Trailblazer” for Its Continued Commitment to Mansfield Certification Process
August 16, 2024
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.