Experience
Cambridge Instruments
Topcon Instrument
We defended Topcon Instrument against a multi-patent ITC case brought by Cambridge Instruments involving devices for diagnosing glaucoma. In a one-week trial held just two months after the case began, we established that Topcon’s instruments were not covered by the patents, and the ITC judge thus denied Cambridge Instruments’ motion for temporary relief. When Cambridge Instruments persisted in its claims and sought a trial on the merits, the judge again ruled in our favor that Topcon’s instruments were not covered by the patents. The matter was promptly settled.
Noncontact Tonometers, 337-TA-270, ITC, Judge Saxon
Certain Robotic Floor Cleaning Devices and Components Thereof
SharkNinja Operating LLC, et al
Finnegan achieves favorable settlement for Chinese software company
Shanghai Hanxiang (CooTek) Information Technology Co., Ltd.
Certain Electronic Imaging Devices
Research in Motion (RIM) d/b/a Blackberry
Certain Portable Electronic Devices
HTC Corp.
Certain Electronic Devices with Image Processing Systems
S3 Graphics Co., Ltd.
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.