Experience
Michael S. Powell
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit upheld a judgment that Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., literally and willfully infringed Finnegan client Mr. Michael S. Powell’s patent covering radial arm saw guards. Specifically, the Federal Circuit affirmed the Southern District of Florida court’s claim construction and the court’s denial of Home Depot’s motion for judgment as a matter of law on the issues of infringement, willfulness, and damages. In addition, the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s holding that the patent was not unenforceable for inequitable conduct, as well as the court’s award of enhanced damages and attorney fees.
Michael S. Powell v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., 10-1409, -1416, Fed. Cir., Judges Dyk, Linn, Prost
Federal Circuit rules in favor of Finnegan client InterDigital in appeal from ITC case
InterDigital Communications Corp.
Hyundai Motor Co.; Kia Motors Corp.
Federal Circuit reverses ITC finding in favor of Finnegan client John Mezzalingua Associates
John Mezzalingua Associates, Inc.
Eli Lilly and Company
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.