• Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Firm
  • Careers
  • Tools
Finnegan
404 Not Found

Not Found

The requested URL /esi/auxiliary-nav.html was not found on this server.

Additionally, a 404 Not Found error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request.

Chemical

About

Chemical is part of our work in Chemical, Industrial, and Materials, and Energy.

Chemical innovations improve lives

From basic elements to highly specialized goods, chemicals are the foundation for products that change the way we live. The chemical industry plays a fundamental role in everything–from the raw materials used in manufacturing to the high-tech products that allow us to communicate, travel, eat, and save lives. Innovative companies and organizations are meeting the demand for greener, faster, and more flexible and efficient products. Beginning with the groundbreaking discoveries of Ziegler and Natta, and continuing with today’s nanotechnology advancements, Finnegan represents innovators that span the full breadth of the chemical industry.

Understanding the law, science, and technology

Our team includes lawyers and professionals also trained as chemists, biological chemists, chemical engineers, polymer scientists, metallurgists, and material scientists. Some worked for major chemical companies, serving as corporate counsel or scientists. Whether it is a new chemical compound, a new combination of chemicals, or a special formulation behind the innovation, we work to protect the IP rights associated with the resulting compositions and products. The various segments of the chemical industry and their customers have their own rules, techniques, and subtleties that can significantly affect the technical and legal analyses and methods of protection. Clients rely on us to analyze their patent portfolios and provide comprehensive, accurate assessments of their IP assets, determining their value, identifying where they need protection, and uncovering potential challenges.  

We help by:

  • Litigating high-value chemical products in district and appellate courts
  • Providing counsel on business-related issues, including landscape analyses of the competitive marketplace and strategies for generating value from IP assets
  • Developing and executing prosecution strategies
  • Advocating for, and defending clients’ interests in, post-grant review and reexamination proceedings at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
  • Writing opinions and providing ongoing counseling for new and existing technologies
  • Conducting due diligence for mergers, acquisitions, licensing, and partnering opportunities
  • Structuring, drafting, and negotiating IP license agreements
  • Providing trademark prosecution and counseling services

From lab discoveries through commercial application, we work with clients in many areas of manufacturing and processing, including:

  • Consumer products
  • Food and beverage
  • Glass manufacturing
  • Oil and gas exploration and refining
  • Paper and pulp
  • Packaging
  • Pesticides
  • Plastics, resins, and polymers
  • Rubber manufacturing

Contacts

Everyone in this industry

Experience

Carnegie Institution of Washington et al. v. Pure Grown Diamonds, Inc. et al.
Represented defendants in a patent infringement action relating to lab-grown diamonds.

1:20-cv-00189, S.D.N.Y., Judge Rakoff

Danisco US Inc. v. Novozymes A/S
Represented Danisco in IPR challenge to Novozymes patent relating to process of recovering oil during ethanol production, leading to favorable institution decision followed by Novozymes’ request for adverse judgment.

IPR2019-01010, PTAB

Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA
Represented patent owner GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA in multiple inter partes review (IPR) proceedings involving vaccine production patents.

IPR2018-01229, -01234, -01236, -01237; IPR2019-00230, -00241, PTAB, Judges Snedden, Kokoski, Smith

AgroFresh Inc. v. Decco U.S. Post-Harvest, Inc. et al.
Representing defendants in action involving patent infringement, trade secrets, and tort claims relating to pre-harvest technology used with produce.

1:16-cv-00662, D. Del., Judges Fallon, Robinson, Bataillon, Noreika

Daicel Corporation v. Celanese International Corp.
Successfully represented Celanese International Corp. in two Federal Circuit appeals from IPR proceedings involving industrial acetic acid production, obtaining affirmance of the PTAB’s rulings in Celanese’s favor.

18-2130, -2131, Fed. Cir.

E. I. du Pont de Nemours v. Synvina C.V.

Represented DuPont and ADM in a successful Federal Circuit appeal from an IPR proceeding, resulting in reversal of the PTAB’s decision and invalidation of all challenged claims of Synvina’s patent directed to production of 2,5-furan dicarboxylic acid.

17-1977, Fed. Cir.

52 More

Insights

Webinar

Maximizing Enforceable Claim Scope While Minimizing Costs for Your Global Portfolio: Considerations for the Chemical and Life Sciences Industries

September 10, 2020

Webinar

Webinar

Recent Developments in Patent Law: Non-Obviousness of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Patents

August 26, 2020

Webinar

Articles

Bendeka® Patents Held to be Valid – A Validity Analysis

Summer 2020

Webinar

Patent Exclusivity Health Checks for Small Molecules: Are Your U.S. Patents Ready to Maximize ROI?

August 11, 2020

Webinar

Webinar

Sect. 112 Indefiniteness in Chemical and Biotech Patent Claims

July 7, 2020

Webinar

Conference

24th Annual Green Chemistry and Engineering Virtual Conference

June 15-19, 2020

Virtual

134 More

News

Commentary

How I Made Partner: Finnegan's Danielle Duszczyszyn Shares Six Keys to Business Development Success

December 16, 2020

Announcement

Finnegan Announces 2019 Mentors of the Year

December 30, 2019

Press Release

NLJ Names Finnegan 2018 “D.C. Intellectual Property Litigation Department of the Year”

May 29, 2018

Media Mention

DC Intellectual Property Litigation Department of the Year: Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

May 28, 2018

Press Release

Law360 Names Finnegan “IP Group of the Year”

January 31, 2018

Media Mention

Fed. Circ. Affirms DuPont Win in Monsanto Patent Re-Exam

January 5, 2018

19 More

Due to international data regulations, we’ve recently updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • EEO Statement

© 2021 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP