Protecting a blockbuster diabetes treatment for AstraZeneca
AstraZeneca AB
Major victories across IP venues for Volkswagen, Audi, Bentley, and Lamborghini
Audi AG; Audi of America, LLC; Automobili Lamborghini America, LLC; Automobili Lamborghini S.p.A.; Bentley Motors Limited; Bentley Motors, Inc; Volkswagen AG; Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
No confusion in trademark victory on summary judgment for the American Retirement Association
American Retirement Association
Finnegan helps Intellia Therapeutics acquire Rewrite Therapeutics, Inc. for $45 million
Intellia Therapeutics, Inc.
Finnegan secures favorable ITC ruling related to innovative electric SUVs for BMW
BMW of North America, LLC and Bayerische Motoren Werke AG
Finnegan fights for Sony’s “exceedingly famous” mark
Sony Group Corporation
Experience
Universal Electronics, Inc. v. Caavo Inc. Universal Electronics, Inc. v. Caavo Inc.
106,113; 106,114, PTAB, Judges Lane, Moore, Katz
Experience
Forward Pharma IP APS v. Biogen MA, Inc. Forward Pharma IP APS v. Biogen MA, Inc.
106,023, PTAB, Judges Gardner-Lane, Katz, Schafer
Experience
PQ Corp. v. Johnson Matthey PLC PQ Corp. v. Johnson Matthey PLC
106,065, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, Judges Schafer, Lane, Katz
Experience
Academisch Ziekenhuis Leiden v. University of Western Australia Academisch Ziekenhuis Leiden v. University of Western Australia
16-2262, 17-1078, Fed. Cir.
Experience
Academisch Ziekenhuis Leiden v. University of Western Australia Academisch Ziekenhuis Leiden v. University of Western Australia
16-1937, -2086, Fed. Cir.
Experience
105,920; 105,923; 105,924, PTAB, Judges Gardner-Lane, Katz, Moore
Experience
Industrial Technology Research Institute v. Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc. Industrial Technology Research Institute v. Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc.
15-1200, Fed. Cir., Judges Lourie, Prost, Wallach
Experience
University of Western Australia v. Academisch Ziekenhuis Leiden University of Western Australia v. Academisch Ziekenhuis Leiden
106,007, 106,008, 106,013, PTAB
Experience
Novartis Vaccines & Diagnostics, Inc. v. Institut Pasteur Novartis Vaccines & Diagnostics, Inc. v. Institut Pasteur
1:07-cv-00034, D.D.C., Judge Contreras
Experience
Interference decision reversed in favor of Phillips’s defibrillator patent Interference decision reversed in favor of Phillips’s defibrillator patent
2:08-cv-00543, W.D. Wash., Judge Pechman
Experience
Iles v. Wanlass Iles v. Wanlass
Interference No. 105,821, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, Judges Lane, Lee, Medley
Experience
United States v. Institut Pasteur United States v. Institut Pasteur
1:08-cv-00161, D.D.C., Judge Roberts
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.