Protecting a blockbuster diabetes treatment for AstraZeneca
AstraZeneca AB
Major victories across IP venues for Volkswagen, Audi, Bentley, and Lamborghini
Audi AG; Audi of America, LLC; Automobili Lamborghini America, LLC; Automobili Lamborghini S.p.A.; Bentley Motors Limited; Bentley Motors, Inc; Volkswagen AG; Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
No confusion in trademark victory on summary judgment for the American Retirement Association
American Retirement Association
Finnegan helps Intellia Therapeutics acquire Rewrite Therapeutics, Inc. for $45 million
Intellia Therapeutics, Inc.
Finnegan secures favorable ITC ruling related to innovative electric SUVs for BMW
BMW of North America, LLC and Bayerische Motoren Werke AG
Finnegan fights for Sony’s “exceedingly famous” mark
Sony Group Corporation
Experience
Finnegan TTAB win for Ambev affirmed at the Federal Circuit Finnegan TTAB win for Ambev affirmed at the Federal Circuit
19-1132, Fed. Cir., Judges Prost, Moore, Wallach
Opposition No. 92059437, TTAB, Judge McCormack
Experience
Closure Systems International v. Novembal USA, Inc. Closure Systems International v. Novembal USA, Inc.
1:19-cv-03944, S.D. Ind., Judge Dinsmore
Experience
AgroFresh Inc. v. Decco U.S. Post-Harvest, Inc. et al. AgroFresh Inc. v. Decco U.S. Post-Harvest, Inc. et al.
1:16-cv-00662, D. Del., Judges Fallon, Robinson, Bataillon, Noreika
Experience
Federal Circuit decisions in IPRs challenging patentability of patents related to aseptic food processing Federal Circuit decisions in IPRs challenging patentability of patents related to aseptic food processing
16-1750, Fed. Cir., Judges Hughes, Mayer, Reyna
17-1193, Fed. Cir., Judges Dyk, Hughes, Reyna
17-1290, Fed. Cir., Judges Dyk, Hughes, Reyna
Experience
Steuben Foods, Inc. v. Nestle USA, Inc. Steuben Foods, Inc. v. Nestle USA, Inc.
1:13-cv-00892, W.D.N.Y., Judges McCarthy, Skretny, Wolford
Experience
Teavana Corp. v. The Veda Company, LLC Teavana Corp. v. The Veda Company, LLC
1:16-cv-02434, E.D.N.Y., Judge Brodie
Experience
PTAB holds three slow-cooker designs unpatentable in rare design patent IPR PTAB holds three slow-cooker designs unpatentable in rare design patent IPR
IPR2013-00500, -00501, -00580, PTAB, Judges Cocks, Giannetti, Wood
2:13-cv-02108, D. Kan., Judges Rushfelt, Vratil
Experience
Mead Johnson Nutrition Co. v. Nestle USA Inc. and Gerber Products Co. Mead Johnson Nutrition Co. v. Nestle USA Inc. and Gerber Products Co.
3:11-cv-00100, S.D. Ind., Judges Young, Hussman
Experience
Courtesy Products v. Royal Cup Courtesy Products v. Royal Cup
1:08-cv-00797, D. Del., Judge Farnan
Experience
Starbucks Coffee Company v. Ruben S. Marshall Starbucks Coffee Company v. Ruben S. Marshall
Oppos. No. 91156879, TTAB, Judge Wellington
Experience
Certain Electrolyte Containing Beverages and Labeling and Packaging Thereof* Certain Electrolyte Containing Beverages and Labeling and Packaging Thereof*
337-TA-1269, ITC, Judge McNamara
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.