Protecting a blockbuster diabetes treatment for AstraZeneca
AstraZeneca AB
Major victories across IP venues for Volkswagen, Audi, Bentley, and Lamborghini
Audi AG; Audi of America, LLC; Automobili Lamborghini America, LLC; Automobili Lamborghini S.p.A.; Bentley Motors Limited; Bentley Motors, Inc; Volkswagen AG; Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
No confusion in trademark victory on summary judgment for the American Retirement Association
American Retirement Association
Finnegan helps Intellia Therapeutics acquire Rewrite Therapeutics, Inc. for $45 million
Intellia Therapeutics, Inc.
Finnegan secures favorable ITC ruling related to innovative electric SUVs for BMW
BMW of North America, LLC and Bayerische Motoren Werke AG
Finnegan fights for Sony’s “exceedingly famous” mark
Sony Group Corporation
Experience
Victories for FOX Factory at Federal Circuit and the PTAB on bike chainring IPRs Victories for FOX Factory at Federal Circuit and the PTAB on bike chainring IPRs
18-2024, -2025, Fed. Cir., Judges Prost, Wallach, Hughes
IPR2017-00118, -00472, PTAB, Judges Kim, Ippolito, Cherry
Experience
OpenTV, Inc. v. Apple, Inc. OpenTV, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.
3:14-cv-01622; 5:15-cv-02008, N.D. Cal., Judges Cousins, Davila, Freeman, Gillam, Ryu, Tigar, Westmore
Experience
California judge grants post-verdict injunction and willful infringement for Asetek California judge grants post-verdict injunction and willful infringement for Asetek
3:13-cv-00457, N.D. Cal., Judges Chen, Corley, Tigar
Experience
Certain Semiconductor Chips and Products Containing Same Certain Semiconductor Chips and Products Containing Same
337-TA-753, ITC, Judge Essex
Experience
Finnegan trade secret case resolved with favorable summary judgment for client RichWave Finnegan trade secret case resolved with favorable summary judgment for client RichWave
2006-1-CV-076689, California Superior Court, Judge Kuhnle
Experience
Juniper Networks, Inc. v. S. Vasanthkumar Juniper Networks, Inc. v. S. Vasanthkumar
2010-1-CV-178564, Sup. Ct. of Cal., Santa Clara County, Judge Kirwan
Experience
Eli Lilly and Company v. Sicor Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Eli Lilly and Company v. Sicor Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
1:06-cv-00238, S.D. Ind., Judges Barker, McVicker Lynch, Magnus-Stinson
Experience
Medtronic Vascular Inc. v. Abbott Vascular, Inc. Medtronic Vascular Inc. v. Abbott Vascular, Inc.
4:06-cv-01066, N.D. Cal., Judges Chen, Hamilton
Experience
When the patent for Zyprexa® and $2 billion in annual revenue were on the line, Eli Lilly turned to Finnegan When the patent for Zyprexa® and $2 billion in annual revenue were on the line, Eli Lilly turned to Finnegan
1:01-cv-00443, S.D. Ind., Judges LaRue, Lynch, Shields, Young
05-1429, -1430, Fed. Cir., Judges Rader, Schall, Gajarsa
Experience
Insight Development Corp. v. Hewlett-Packard Insight Development Corp. v. Hewlett-Packard
4:98-cv-03349, N.D. Cal., Judge Wilken
01-1459, -1548, Fed. Cir., Judges Michel, Plager, Rader
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.