直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Federal Circuit IP Decisions

Appeal

Ericsson Inc. v. TCL Communication Technology Holdings Limited

Precedential

Case

18-2003

Venue
Federal Circuit
Decision Type
Vacated in Part, Reversed
Judges
Prost, Sharon; Pauline Newman; Raymond Chen; Authored by Prost; Dissenting opinion authored by Newman
Date
April 14, 2020

Originating Venue Decision

Ericsson Inc. v. TCL Communication Technology Holdings, Ltd.

Case

2:15-cv-00011

Venue
U.S. District Court, E.D. Texas
Decision Type
Memorandum Opinion, Claim Construction Order
Judges
Payne, Roy S.
Date
November 30, 2015

Originating Venue Decision

Ericsson Inc. v. TCL Communication Technology Holdings, Ltd.

Case

2:15-cv-00011

Venue
U.S. District Court, E.D. Texas
Decision Type
Memorandum Opinion, Motion for Summary Judgment Denied, Motion to Strike Granted in Part, Motion to Strike Denied in Part, Motion to Strike Granted, Motion to Strike Denied, Motion for Claim Construction Denied, Motion to Bifurcate Issues Denied, Not Invalid
Judges
Payne, Roy S.
Date
November 4, 2017

Originating Venue Decision

Ericsson Inc. v. TCL Communication Technology Holdings, Ltd.

Case

2:15-cv-00011

Venue
U.S. District Court, E.D. Texas
Decision Type
Motion in Limine Granted, Motion in Limine Granted in Part, Motion in Limine Denied in Part, Denied, Withdrawn
Judges
Payne, Roy S.
Date
November 8, 2017

Originating Venue Decision

Ericsson Inc. v. TCL Communication Technology Holdings, Ltd.

Case

2:15-cv-00011

Venue
U.S. District Court, E.D. Texas
Decision Type
Motion to Strike Denied in Part, Motion to Strike Granted in Part
Judges
Payne, Roy S.
Date
November 8, 2017

Originating Venue Decision

Ericsson Inc. v. TCL Communication Technology Holdings, Ltd.

Case

2:15-cv-00011

Venue
U.S. District Court, E.D. Texas
Decision Type
Motion for Reconsideration Denied
Judges
Payne, Roy S.
Date
November 28, 2017

Originating Venue Decision

Ericsson Inc. v. TCL Communication Technology Holdings, Ltd.

Case

2:15-cv-00011

Venue
U.S. District Court, E.D. Texas
Decision Type
Motion in Limine Granted, Motion in Limine Granted in Part, Motion in Limine Denied in Part, Denied, Withdrawn
Judges
Payne, Roy S.
Date
November 29, 2017

Originating Venue Decision

Ericsson Inc. v. TCL Communication Technology Holdings, Ltd.

Case

2:15-cv-00011

Venue
U.S. District Court, E.D. Texas
Decision Type
Judgment, Infringed, Damages Awarded
Judges
Payne, Roy S.
Date
December 13, 2017

Originating Venue Decision

Ericsson Inc. v. TCL Communication Technology Holdings, Ltd.

Case

2:15-cv-00011

Venue
U.S. District Court, E.D. Texas
Decision Type
Memorandum Opinion, Judgment as a Matter of Law Denied, Damages Awarded, Fees Not Awarded, Stayed in Part, New Trial Denied, Motion for Reconsideration Granted, Motion to Bifurcate Issues Granted in Part, Enhanced Damages Awarded, Pre-Judgment Interest Awarded
Judges
Payne, Roy S.
Date
May 10, 2018

Originating Venue Decision

Ericsson Inc. v. TCL Communication Technology Holdings, Ltd.

Case

2:15-cv-00011

Venue
U.S. District Court, E.D. Texas
Decision Type
Final Judgment, Infringed, Damages Awarded, Enhanced Damages Awarded, Dismissed, Costs Not Awarded, Stayed in Part, Pre-Judgment Interest Awarded, Not Infringed
Judges
Payne, Roy S.
Date
May 10, 2018

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP