直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Federal Circuit IP Decisions

Appeal

Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.

Precedential

Case

18-2140

En Banc
Yes
Venue
Federal Circuit
Decision Type
Petition for En Banc Denied, Petition for Panel Rehearing Denied
Judges
Prost, Sharon; Pauline Newman; Alan Lourie; Timothy Dyk; Moore, Kimberly A.; Reyna, Jimmie V.; Evan Wallach; Richard Taranto; Raymond Chen; Todd Hughes; Kara Stoll; Moore, with whom O’Malley, Reyna and Chen join, concurs in the denial of the petitions for rehearing en banc; O’Malley, with whom Moore and Reyna join, concurs in the denial of the petitions for rehearing en banc; Dyk, with whom Newman and Wallach join, and with whom Hughes, joins as to Part I.A, dissents from the denial of the petitions for rehearing en banc; Hughes, with whom Wallach joins, dissents from the denial of the petitions for rehearing en banc; Wallach dissents from the denial of the petitions for rehearing en banc.
Date
March 23, 2020

Originating Venue Decision

Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.

Case

2018-2140

Venue
U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Decision Type
Vacated, Remanded
Judges
Moore, Kimberly A.; Reyna, Jimmie V.; Raymond Chen; Authored by Moore
Date
October 31, 2019

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP