Associate
Matthew (Matt) Johnson practices across a diverse array of patent law, including district court and appellate litigation, patent prosecution, post-grant proceedings, and portfolio development and management. He has expertise in technical fields ranging from computer science and electronics to software, financial services, automotive, and medical devices.
Matt has experience in many different stages of litigation, including strategy development, infringement and validity analysis, drafting motions and written discovery, document production management, and appeals.
Matt is experienced with all aspects of patent prosecution, helping inventors and companies manage and refine their patent portfolios, expanding their legal protections, and aiding in developing their patent strategy. His patent prosecution practice includes working with photoelectric technologies, computer software, information systems, and microelectronics. His insight helps clients with correctly positioning their technology in their relevant field to navigate complex issues, such as patent validity in otherwise crowded markets of competing technology.
Prior to joining Finnegan, Matt served honorably as a nuclear surface warfare officer in the United States Navy, where he was a subject matter expert in nuclear reactors afloat and oversaw the complex maintenance and operation of two operating reactors onboard the USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN-72). He managed a large team of sailors in maintaining the ship's complex high voltage electrical system and became intimately familiar with electrical componentry of microvoltage electronic systems and high voltage electrical grids. He was also a critical member involved in the complex process of depressurizing and cooling down those nuclear reactors in preparation for nuclear refueling.
Matt regularly handles pro bono work as he seeks to serve fellow military veterans in navigating the disability process and representing them before the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veteran Claims.
Arigna Technology Limited v. Volkswagen AG, et al.
337-TA-1267, ITC, Judge Bhattacharyya
IPR2021-01321, -01531, PTAB, Judges Baer, Fenick, Iftikhar
2:21-cv-00054; -00172, E.D. Tex., Judge Gilstrap
Federal Circuit IP Blog
Spotlight on Upcoming Oral Arguments – March 2023 Spotlight on Upcoming Oral Arguments – March 2023
March 6, 2023
Articles
Circuit Split Complicates US Discovery in Foreign Tribunals Circuit Split Complicates US Discovery in Foreign Tribunals
February 22, 2023
Law360Articles
Cisco’s Appeal of $2.75B Award Raises Important Questions on Direct Infringement and Apportionment Cisco’s Appeal of $2.75B Award Raises Important Questions on Direct Infringement and Apportionment
March 22, 2022
Intellectual Asset ManagementArticles
Siri, Take the Wheel: Smart Transportation and Intellectual Property Siri, Take the Wheel: Smart Transportation and Intellectual Property
March 13, 2022
CalcalistArticles
Lacking Control: Why Subsidiaries (Mostly) Can’t Produce a Parent’s Information Lacking Control: Why Subsidiaries (Mostly) Can’t Produce a Parent’s Information
May 6, 2021
Westlaw Journal Intellectual PropertyFederal Circuit IP Blog
Spotlight on Upcoming Oral Arguments – April 2021 Spotlight on Upcoming Oral Arguments – April 2021
April 1, 2021
Due to international data regulations, we’ve recently updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
The Finnegan UPC Hub is a one-stop shop for our insights related to the Unified Patent Court (UPC).