Associate
Andrew's litigation experience includes conducting pre-filing investigations, coordinating fact and expert discovery, taking and defending depositions, working with experts, managing day-to-day litigation activities, preparing for and going to trial and drafting post-trial briefing.
Andrew's technical experience focused on the production and performance-testing of metal alloys ceramics. He was a recipient of the Metallurgy Trust Fund Scholarship. While earning his undergraduate degree, he worked on the synthesis and characterization of manganese dioxide nanorods at the Australian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology at the University of Queensland.
Biogen International GmbH v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
1:17-cv-00829, D. Del., Judge Noreika
1:17-cv-00116, U.S. District Court, N.D. West Virginia, Judge Keeley
Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. v. Apotex Corp.
1:14-cv-01078, -04671, -02982, -07405, -05878, -06398 -08074 -03306, -06890, -05876, -08077, -03168, -07252, -07105 -05537, -03996, -06158, -04508, -04307, -06397, -07106, -01979, -03445; 1:15-cv-0161, -07584, -01585, -07803, -08830, -05109, -07802, -08955, -01716, -01967, -06353, -08305; 1:16-cv-05288, -05400, -05949, -07705 -02475, -02476, -08284, -05743, -00086, -08085, -00555, -00557, -07346, -06067, -00405, -00424, -05688, -09603; 1:17-cv-02754, -00392, D.N.J., Judges Simandle, Williams
Celgard, LLC v. SK Innovation Co.
3:13-cv-00254, W.D.N.C., Judges Cayer, Cogburn
14-1807, Fed. Cir., Judges Newman, Reyna, Wallach
Conference
24th Annual Green Chemistry and Engineering Virtual Conference 24th Annual Green Chemistry and Engineering Virtual Conference
June 15-19, 2020
Virtual
Articles
Recent Developments in Patent Law: Non-Obviousness of Pharmaceutical Formulations Recent Developments in Patent Law: Non-Obviousness of Pharmaceutical Formulations
August 29, 2019
Bloomberg LawArticles
Expert Opinions on Reasonable Royalties Must Have a Basis for Comparison to Licenses on Which They Rely and Tie Them to the Facts of the Case Expert Opinions on Reasonable Royalties Must Have a Basis for Comparison to Licenses on Which They Rely and Tie Them to the Facts of the Case
February 27, 2019
LES InsightsArticles
Supreme Court Restricts Where Patent Owners May Sue for Patent Infringement Supreme Court Restricts Where Patent Owners May Sue for Patent Infringement
May 30, 2017
LES InsightsArticles
Court Dismisses Divided Infringement Claim Because Customer's Data Entry Steps Were Not Attributable to the Defendant Software Vendor Court Dismisses Divided Infringement Claim Because Customer's Data Entry Steps Were Not Attributable to the Defendant Software Vendor
November 29, 2016
LES InsightsArticles
A Prior Agreement to Outsource Manufacturing Does Not Invalidate a Patent A Prior Agreement to Outsource Manufacturing Does Not Invalidate a Patent
August 16, 2016
LES InsightsDue to international data regulations, we’ve recently updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.