September 28, 2016
Webinar
Much has happened since the Supreme Court’s Alice decision in 2014 that fundamentally changed the landscape for computer and software innovations in the United States. While both the Federal Circuit and the USPTO have made efforts to provide guidance to applicants and litigants, there is still much uncertainty when it comes to assessing patent eligibility under 35 U.S.C. § 101. Looking overseas to Europe, many have found the EPO’s decisions and claim approaches—such as the technical problem/solution inquiry—to be helpful in developing global drafting and prosecution strategies. Join our panel as we cover the following topics in this webinar:
This webinar is the fourth in Finnegan’s 2016 “Strategic Patent Series for European Counsel.”
Moderator:
C. Gregory Gramenopoulos
Speakers:
Timothy J. May
Date:
Wednesday, September 28, 2016
15:00 - 16:00 BST
16:00 - 17:00 CEST
10:00 - 11:00 a.m. EDT
Scheduling Conflict? Finnegan records all hosted webinars. To view the recorded program, simply register for the webinar and you will receive an access link shortly after the live program is complete.
Lecture
Patent Protection for Software-Related Inventions in Europe and the USA Training Course
June 5, 2024
Hybrid
10th Annual Georgia Asian Pacific American Bar Association Gala
May 29, 2024
Atlanta
Workshop
Life Sciences Workshop: Updates and Key Trends in Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology IP Law
May 2, 2024
Cambridge
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.