June 17, 2014
Practising Law Institute
In January 2012, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) opened the application period for new generic top-level domains (gTLDs). Despite the $185,000 cost to submit an application for a new gTLD, ICANN received 1,930 applications.
A top-level domain (TLD) is the portion of a domain name that typically comes last. For instance, in the domain www.BRAND.com, .com is the gTLD, sometimes referred to as the first level domain. The portion that comes before the TLD is referred to as the second-level domain. In the example above, “BRAND” is the second-level domain. If the domain was written www.BRAND.icann.org, “BRAND” would be the third-level domain and “icann” would be the second-level domain.
Although just over three years have passed since the announcement was made to open the Internet to new gTLDs, the landscape surrounding its impact on intellectual property protection, primarily involving trademarks, remains murky. Many brand owners are unsure of the protective measures available for their trademarks, and some are uncertain about whether the economic benefits associated with pursuing new gTLDs will offset the costs.
Before the recent expansion, there were 22 TLDs in existence, including the common .com, .net, .edu, and .org. The stated purpose behind “opening” the Internet to new gTLDs was to free the overcrowded gTLDs, such as .com and .net, allowing for increased opportunities for expression in domain names. The argument goes that with such few gTLDs available, the second-level domain space was becoming overcrowded and consumers entering the domain marketplace were left with sparse options for domain names. Yet, there remains some skepticism about the true motive for the decision, given that organizations such as ICANN stand to gain considerable economic benefit.
Despite the controversy, the program has been immensely popular. In 2014, new gTLD registrations totaled 1.5 million, or 0.5% of global TLD registrations. Reports also predict that by December 2015, gTLD registrations could surpass the 10 million mark. Leading the new gTLDs in domain name creation is .guru with more than 79,000 domains registered under this gTLD thus far. Companies seeking to become registry operators, such as Donuts, have already received significant economic backing and stand poised to profit greatly.
The popularity of the program proves that brand owners cannot afford to ignore it. As the Internet continues to expand, brand owners must formulate a strategy to protect their valuable rights. This article discusses some of the protective mechanisms established for that goal as well as some of the cases that have been brought under them. It also discusses the new United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) regulations regarding the registration of gTLDs.
Lecture
Patent Protection for Software-Related Inventions in Europe and the USA Training Course
June 5, 2024
Hybrid
Workshop
Life Sciences Workshop: Updates and Key Trends in Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology IP Law
May 2, 2024
Cambridge
Conference
Boston Intellectual Property Law Association 4th Annual Symposium
April 10-11, 2024
Boston
Conference
Best Practices in Intellectual Property– A Decade of Dedication to IP Excellence
April 8-9, 2024
Tel Aviv
INCONTESTABLE® Blog
Winning the Battle but Not the War: Disclaimer Requirement Overturned, Section 2(d) Objection Upheld
March 28, 2024
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.