Our Insights
Never miss an Insight.
Sign upProsecution First Blog
Expecting the “Unexpected”: Asserted Claims Found Invalid After Allegedly “Unexpected Results” Suggested in Prior Art References Expecting the “Unexpected”: Asserted Claims Found Invalid After Allegedly “Unexpected Results” Suggested in Prior Art References
January 27, 2023
Prosecution First Blog
PTA and After-Allowance Papers: Damned If You Do, Damned If You Don’t? PTA and After-Allowance Papers: Damned If You Do, Damned If You Don’t?
January 20, 2023
Prosecution First Blog
Federal Circuit Clarifies the Standard of Review for Invalidity Challenges Federal Circuit Clarifies the Standard of Review for Invalidity Challenges
January 13, 2023
Prosecution First Blog
The CCPA’s Lasting Impact on U.S. Patent Law - an Examination of CCPA Definiteness Decisions The CCPA’s Lasting Impact on U.S. Patent Law - an Examination of CCPA Definiteness Decisions
January 6, 2023
Prosecution First Blog
Federal Circuit Affirms Motion to Strike and Motion for Summary Judgment After Expert Applies “Materially Different” Claim Construction Federal Circuit Affirms Motion to Strike and Motion for Summary Judgment After Expert Applies “Materially Different” Claim Construction
December 30, 2022
Prosecution First Blog
A "Driver" in Claim Construction: Claim Differentiation and Intrinsic Evidence in the Specification Are Important Factors for Defining Language in a Claim A "Driver" in Claim Construction: Claim Differentiation and Intrinsic Evidence in the Specification Are Important Factors for Defining Language in a Claim
December 16, 2022
Prosecution First Blog
Inequitable Conduct Claim Can Progress Even After the Case Is Complete Inequitable Conduct Claim Can Progress Even After the Case Is Complete
December 9, 2022
Prosecution First Blog
Distinct Elements or Parts of a Whole? Obviousness Challenge Denied in SolarEdge Techs., Inc. v. Fronius Int’l GMBH Distinct Elements or Parts of a Whole? Obviousness Challenge Denied in SolarEdge Techs., Inc. v. Fronius Int’l GMBH
November 25, 2022
Prosecution First Blog
Credibility Matters: Defendants’ Expert Witness Helps Bring a Non-Infringement Win Credibility Matters: Defendants’ Expert Witness Helps Bring a Non-Infringement Win
November 18, 2022
Prosecution First Blog
What Is an “Account”? Nonobviousness Argument Based Only on Proposed Construction Backfires for Caselas What Is an “Account”? Nonobviousness Argument Based Only on Proposed Construction Backfires for Caselas
November 11, 2022
Due to international data regulations, we’ve recently updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
The Finnegan UPC Hub is a one-stop shop for our insights related to the Unified Patent Court (UPC).