直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Firm
  • Offices
  • Careers
Finnegan
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • IP Health Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Articles
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
  • Events
  • Webinars
  • Books

IP Health Blog

CAFC Holds Medical Device Claims Patent Eligible in CardioNet v. InfoBionic

May 4, 2020

By Kathryn R. Judson

Edited by Kathleen A. Daley

In CardioNet, LLC v. InfoBionic, Inc., No. 2019-1149 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 17, 2020), the Federal Circuit reversed the district court’s determination that the claims covering a device for monitoring electrical activity in the heart to detect the presence of atrial fibrillation were patent ineligible under 35 U.S.C. § 101. The Court explained that the claims were not directed to an abstract idea, but instead a patent-eligible improvement to cardiac monitoring technology. The Court cautioned against oversimplifying the claims and clarified that the Alice step one inquiry can be resolved at the Rule 12(b)(6) stage without looking outside the intrinsic evidence. Judge Dyk dissented-in-part, arguing that the majority improperly assessed the role of extrinsic evidence in the patent-eligibility analysis. Further discussion of the decision can be found on Finnegan’s Federal Circuit IP Blog.

Tags

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC), patent-eligible, claim construction, Written description (35 USC § 112)

Related Industries

Life Sciences

Medical Device and Diagnostics

Related Offices

Washington, DC

Contacts

Kathryn R. Judson
Associate
Atlanta, GA
+1 404 653 6466
Email
Kathleen_Daley
Kathleen A. Daley
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4098
Email

Copyright © 2020 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. 


DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.

Related Insights

Conference

2022 ANA Masters of Advertising Law Conference

November 8-10, 2022

Hollywood

Conference

IPBC Asia 2022

October 31 - November 2, 2022

Tokyo

Conference

RoboBusiness 2022

October 19-20, 2022

Santa Clara

Conference

Life Sciences IP Summit 2022

October 17-18, 2022

Munich

Conference

California Intellectual Property Law Institute 2022

October 17-18, 2022

San Francisco

Conference

2022 All Ohio Annual Institute on Intellectual Property

October 11-12, 2022

Virtual

Workshop

Passport to Proficiency on the Essentials of Hatch-Waxman and BPCIA

October 11-27, 2022

Webinar

Conference

2022 World IP Forum

October 10-12, 2022

Bangkok

Conference

PTMG Autumn Conference 2022

October 5-8, 2022

Lisbon

Due to international data regulations, we’ve recently updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

If you have European patents, you need to know about the Unified Patent Court (UPC).

Finnegan
Click Here
  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • EEO Statement

© 2022 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP