直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Offices
  • Management

Commentary

Counsel Say IPEC Costs Concerns May Not Be Fixable

May 12, 2022

Managing Intellectual Property

The Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (IPEC) was intended to be a lower-cost forum for small intellectual property (IP) claims in England and Wales. However, the court has received pushback from many practitioners arguing that abusive tactics used at the court, such as using excessive expert witnesses and stacking legal teams with expensive lawyers and staff, are raising costs to High Court levels. Practitioners are calling for reform in various areas of the court to mitigate the abusive tactics. Managing Intellectual Property interviewed Finnegan partner Nicholas Fox to discuss his thoughts on proposed reform ideas. 

One proposed reform idea is to establish a limit on court costs to prevent fees from spiraling. Nicholas stated that if a party is “determined to run up costs regardless,” then placing a cap on fees would be ineffective in preventing a large cost. 

He continued, “The main question is, how often does that occur? Given the overall [high] volume of IPEC cases, I am not sure that it is a very common problem.” 

Read "Counsel Say IPEC Costs Concerns May Not Be Fixable"

Tags

court fees

Related Practices

European, German, and UK IP Law

Related Offices

London

Related Professionals

Nicholas Fox
Partner
London
+ 44 (0)20 7864 2820
Email

Related News

Media Mention

Finnegan Elects Former Summer Associate as Managing Partner

June 29, 2022

Press Release

Leadership Transition at Finnegan Illustrates Continued Commitment to Diversity

June 29, 2022

Commentary

New Guidance Will Boost ‘Generic’ Trademark Denials, Lawyers Say

June 24, 2022

Press Release

Seramount Names Finnegan One of the “Best Law Firms for Women”

June 23, 2022

Commentary

How I Made It to Law Firm Leadership: 'Have a Steadfast Commitment to Promoting an Objective and Inclusive Dialogue,' Says Laura Masurovsky of Finnegan

June 22, 2022

Commentary

Vidal Memo Clarifying PTAB Discretionary Denial Analysis Says Fintiv Does Not Apply to Parallel ITC Investigations

June 22, 2022

Commentary

Vidal's New Guidance May Make Fintiv Denials Even Rarer

June 22, 2022

Commentary

Fintiv Guidance Vexes Doctrine’s In-House Backers and Critics

June 22, 2022

Commentary

Patents a Problem for AI, but Inventors Still Finding Ways to Thrive

June 22, 2022

Due to international data regulations, we’ve recently updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • EEO Statement

© 2022 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP