直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
    • AI + Finnegan
    • Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
    • Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
    • Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
    • Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
    • Prosecution and Portfolio Management
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • Life Sciences
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • Experience

Experience

Directed verdict on behalf of defendants in the Eastern District of Texas

Paradox Security Systems, Ltd.

ADT Security Systems, Inc. and Digital Security Controls, Ltd.

On the third day of trial in the Eastern District of Texas, the judge directed a verdict against the plaintiffs and in favor of Finnegan clients ADT Security Systems, Inc. and Digital Security Controls, Ltd. on all claims. The plaintiffs were seeking damages for the alleged infringement of a patent relating to a telephone line coupler circuit. The judge’s ruling for the defendants followed in the wake of a number of favorable rulings on pretrial motions that narrowed the scope of the case.

Paradox Security Systems, Ltd. v. ADT Security Systems, Inc. and Digital Security Controls, Ltd., 2:06-cv-00462, E.D. Tex., Judge Ward

Related Practices

Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials

Patent Litigation and Trials

Related Industries

Electrical and Computer Technology

Electronic Devices and Components

Related Experiences

Paradox Security Systems, Ltd. v. ADT Security Services, Inc.

ADT Security Services, Inc.; Digital Security Controls

Eastern District of Texas invalidates patent asserted against Finnegan client FedEx Corporation

FedEx Corp.

Parental Guide of Texas, Inc. v. Funai Corporation, Inc. et al.

Philips Electronics

Successfully defending GTECH against infringement accusations

GTECH Corp.

Finnegan obtains jury verdict of non-infringement for longtime client FedEx

FedEx Corp.

Ningde Amperex Technology Limited v. Zhuhai CosMX Battery Co., Ltd.

Zhuhai CosMX Battery Co., Ltd.

District court enters judgment of noninfringement for Finnegan client Philips

Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.

Settlement achieved for Boeing

The Boeing Company

Finnegan client FedEx defeats Ronald Katz’s 11 year licensing litigation

FedEx Corp.

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP