Partner
Kevin represents plaintiffs and defendants in district court litigation, and advises clients on prosecution strategies, patent validity and infringement opinions, and due diligence investigations. His practice includes aspects of wireless technology, data processing, optical systems, mobile devices, consumer products, and specialty materials. His technical background encompasses a variety of computer, electrical, and advanced materials-related technologies.
Prior to joining Finnegan, Kevin served as an intellectual property and licensing consultant to Pieris AG in Freising, Germany, assisting in a variety of patent-related matters, including portfolio management, transfer agreements, and patent licenses.
Electronic Receipts Delivery System, LLC v. Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
Achieved favorable settlement for client in the financial services field on infringement claim relating to remote deposit capture of checks.
3:19-cv-01313, M.D. Fla., Judges Corrigan, Barksdale
Auth Token LLC v. Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
3-22-cv-00268, M.D. Fla., Judges Howard, Richardson
Peoplechart Corporation v. Wintrust Bank, NA
1:21-cv-00031, N.D. Ill., Judge Kennelly
Groove Digital, Inc. v. United Bank
Represented defendant United Bank in a patent infringement action.
1:18-cv-00966, E.D. Va., Judges O'Grady, Buchanan
Nestle USA, Inc. v. Steuben Foods, Inc.
Represented Nestlé USA in three appeals from inter partes review (IPR) decisions by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). In two cases, the Federal Circuit vacated the PTAB decisions upholding the patentability of the challenged claims and remanded the cases. In the third case, the Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB’s finding that the challenged claims were unpatentable.
16-1750, Fed. Cir., Judges Hughes, Mayer, Reyna
17-1193, Fed. Cir., Judges Dyk, Hughes, Reyna
17-1290, Fed. Cir., Judges Dyk, Hughes, Reyna
DataTreasury Corp. v. Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
2:17-cv-00432, E.D. Tex., Judges Gilstrap, Payne
CBM2014-00020, -00021, PTAB, Judges Clements, Saindon, Tierney
16-1046, -1048, Fed. Cir., Judges Chen, Moore, Wallach
16-883, S. Ct.
Articles
Southeast Litigation Update: June and July 2023 Southeast Litigation Update: June and July 2023
September 12, 2023
Podcasts
USPTO Pro Bono Initiatives and Resources USPTO Pro Bono Initiatives and Resources
July 28, 2023
Podcasts
June 2023 - Last Month at the Federal Circuit Podcast Series June 2023 - Last Month at the Federal Circuit Podcast Series
July 2023
IP Updates
Senate Legislation Proposes Changes to Patent Eligibility and PTAB Proceedings Senate Legislation Proposes Changes to Patent Eligibility and PTAB Proceedings
June 27, 2023
Articles
Trending at the PTAB: When to Ask Court for Litigation Stay Trending at the PTAB: When to Ask Court for Litigation Stay
March 30, 2023
Law360"The commercially aware Kevin Rodkey is an IP all-rounder who quickly gets to strategic points to dispense sage counsel to his following…"
Intellectual Asset Management Patent 1000
“Local lawyers Trenton Ward, Jason Stach and Kevin Rodkey have all been instrumental in powering Finnegan’s volume and success in PTAB proceedings.”
Intellectual Asset Management Patent 1000
"The commercially aware Kevin Rodkey is an IP all-rounder who quickly gets to strategic points to dispense sage counsel to his following…"
Intellectual Asset Management Patent 1000
“Local lawyers Trenton Ward, Jason Stach and Kevin Rodkey have all been instrumental in powering Finnegan’s volume and success in PTAB proceedings.”
Intellectual Asset Management Patent 1000
Press Release
Finnegan Receives Top Rankings from Intellectual Asset Management; 46 Attorneys Ranked Finnegan Receives Top Rankings from Intellectual Asset Management; 46 Attorneys Ranked
June 30, 2023
Intellectual Asset ManagementPress Release
45 Finnegan Attorneys Recommended by Intellectual Asset Management; Firm Continues to Be Top Ranked 45 Finnegan Attorneys Recommended by Intellectual Asset Management; Firm Continues to Be Top Ranked
July 8, 2022
Intellectual Asset ManagementCommentary
PTAB Reform Bill: A 'Reasonable Fine-Tuning' PTAB Reform Bill: A 'Reasonable Fine-Tuning'
June 24, 2022
World Intellectual Property ReviewCommentary
Fintiv Denials Are Down, But Bill Banning Them Still Has Teeth Fintiv Denials Are Down, But Bill Banning Them Still Has Teeth
June 17, 2022
Law360Commentary
USPTO's Arthrex Guidance Offers Window into Agency's Thinking USPTO's Arthrex Guidance Offers Window into Agency's Thinking
July 26, 2021
World Intellectual Property ReviewCommentary
Fed. Circ.'s Camera Patent Ax Makes Eligibility Rules Murkier Fed. Circ.'s Camera Patent Ax Makes Eligibility Rules Murkier
June 17, 2021
Law360Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.