直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
    • AI + Finnegan
    • Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
    • Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
    • Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
    • Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
    • Prosecution and Portfolio Management
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • Life Sciences
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • Experience

Experience

Protecting the patents of a household name

Fischer & Paykel

LG Electronics

The market for high-end, large-capacity, technologically advanced washing machines is intensely competitive. When LG entered the U.S. market, Whirlpool and Fischer & Paykel each sued LG, claiming LG’s washers infringed their patents. They did not prevail. Instead, in each case, Finnegan employed an aggressive pretrial strategy that identified strong invalidity defenses. The strength of LG’s prior art defenses caused the opponent in each case to submit the patents to reexamination and stay the cases, pending the reexaminations. When the reexaminations were completed years after the respective lawsuits were initiated, the Fisher & Paykel action was dismissed, and the Whirlpool action was settled at very favorable terms. LG’s washers remain one of the market leaders in the U.S.

Fischer & Paykel v. LG Electronics, 3:03-cv-50146, N.D. Ill., Judges Kapala, Mahoney

Related Practices

Ex Parte Reexamination (EPR)

Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials

Pretrial Strategies

Patent Litigation and Trials

Related Industries

Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials

Manufacturing

Consumer Products

Electrical and Computer Technology

Related Experiences

Protecting the trademark of a household name

LG Electronics

Fisher Paykel v. LG Electronics

LG Electronics

Finnegan protects Subaru’s mark “Crosstrek”

Subaru

Federal Circuit, district court, and arbitration victories protect Cumberland Pharmaceuticals’ flagship product, Acetadote®

Cumberland Pharmaceuticals

Alfa Laval, Alfdex AB v. Hengst, Paccar, Inc.

Alfa Laval; Alfdex AB

Protecting business-method patents for a travel-related company

Superior Graphite Co. v. TIMCAL S.A., Ltd.

TIMCAL S.A., Ltd.

Viskase Corp. v. W.R. Grace

W.R. Grace

W.R. Grace & Co. v. Viskase Corp.

W.R. Grace & Co.

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP