直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
    • AI + Finnegan
    • Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
    • Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
    • Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
    • Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
    • Prosecution and Portfolio Management
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • Life Sciences
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • Experience

Experience

Finnegan prevails in U.S. trademark opposition for Emilio Pucci

Emilo Pucci International BV

El Corte Ingles, S.A.

The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board granted judgment in favor of Italian design house Emilio Pucci (subsidiary of luxury goods conglomerate LVMH Moët Hennessy), finding that the defendant’s mark EMIDIO TUCCI for apparel and accessories is confusingly similar to the client’s long-used EMILIO PUCCI mark for fashion products. In response to submissions showing extensive use of EMILIO PUCCI since the early 1950s on a wide variety of clothing and other goods, the Board found that the mark had developed “substantial renown” in the field of apparel and accessories and become a “well-established brand.” Pucci defeated defendant’s argument that the expensive nature of Pucci’s products limited its renown to a small group of sophisticated purchasers (mostly women) by submitting extensive evidence showing broad public recognition of the mark.

Emilo Pucci International BV v. El Corte Ingles, S.A., Oppos. Nos. 91169638, 91177724, TTAB, Judge Lykos

Related Practices

Trademark and Brand Management

Trademark Oppositions and Cancellations

Trademark Litigation and Trials

Related Industries

Consumer Products

Related Experiences

Pucci International, Ltd. v. Emilio Pucci International B.V.

Emilio Pucci International B.V.

Finnegan TTAB win for Ambev affirmed at the Federal Circuit

Ambev S.A.

Finnegan client BTG prevails in EPO opposition proceedings in the field of vein sclerotherapy

BTG International, Ltd.

Finnegan achieves sweet victory for Ukrainian candy maker

Roshen

Victory for Finnegan client PNC in first case to apply B&B Hardware to issue of trademark priority

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.

Finnegan client Capsugel prevails in one of the first U.S. post-grant proceedings

Capsugel Belgium NV

PrimeSense, Ltd. v. Primesensor Technology, Inc.

PrimeSense, Ltd.

recording microphone

Finnegan fights for Sony’s “exceedingly famous” mark

Sony Group Corporation

Worldwide protection for Bauer Hockey’s traditional and non-traditional trademarks

Bauer Hockey

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP