Patent Prosecution Update
October 2012
Of Disparagement, Disavowal, and Unreasonableness at the USPTO
There are many things that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), or a district court judge in litigation, considers during the slippery process of claim construction. Among the less-sharply defined criteria is whether an applicant or patentee disparaged or disavowed a particular approach to practicing the invention. More
Potential Pitfalls of Broad Claim Language
When drafting patent claims, patentees generally attempt to draft the broadest set of claims possible in order to benefit from the full scope of their inventive contribution. To pass muster at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) these broad claims, given their broadest reasonable interpretation, must have sufficient support in the patent specification. More
Of Disparagement, Disavowal, and Unreasonableness at the USPTO
There are many things that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), or a district court judge in litigation, considers during the slippery process of claim construction. Among the less-sharply defined criteria is whether an applicant or patentee disparaged or disavowed a particular approach to practicing the invention. More
Potential Pitfalls of Broad Claim Language
When drafting patent claims, patentees generally attempt to draft the broadest set of claims possible in order to benefit from the full scope of their inventive contribution. To pass muster at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) these broad claims, given their broadest reasonable interpretation, must have sufficient support in the patent specification. More
Rule Review
United States Ratifies the PLT
Read
EPO Practice
Using Art. 115 Observations
Read
At the Federal Circuit
Inducement and Claims Drafting
Read
Articles
Marine Polymer’s Wake: Understanding Intervening Rights and the New U.S. Patent Office Procedures
Medical Devices Summit Europe
Webinar: America Invents Act Implementation and Its Impact on Asian Corporations
DISCLAIMER: The information contained herein is intended to convey general information only and should not be construed as a legal opinion or as legal advice. The firm disclaims liability for any errors or omissions and readers should not take any action that relies upon the information contained in this newsletter. You should consult your own lawyer concerning your own situation and any specific legal questions. This promotional newsletter does not establish any form of attorney-client relationship with our firm or with any of our attorneys.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact:
Eric P. Raciti, Editor-in-Chief
Rebecca L. Harker, Associate Editor
Eric P. Raciti, Editor-in-Chief
Rebecca L. Harker, Associate Editor
Washington, DC ▪ Atlanta, GA ▪ Boston, MA ▪ Palo Alto, CA ▪ Reston, VA ▪ Brussels ▪ Shanghai ▪ Taipei ▪ Tokyo
www.finnegan.com
Copyright © 2012 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP | All rights reserved