Finnegan
Patent Prosecution Update
June 2014

An Update on Subject Matter Eligibility in the United States
The past three months have been a busy period for those following the U.S. patent eligibility law.  Recent examination guidance published by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) may affect patent applications with composition or method claims in a variety of chemical, materials science, and biological arts.  The Federal Circuit’s recent decision in In re Roslin Institute (Edinburgh), No. 2013-1407 (Fed. Cir. May 8, 2014), also provides information about how the U.S. courts may consider patent eligibility of composition claims in the wake of recent U.S. Supreme Court case law.   More

PTAB Holds Challenged Claims Unpatentable as Obvious over a Combination of References
In covered business method post-grant proceeding Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Co., the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) held all of the challenged claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,064,970 (“the ’970 patent”) unpatentable as obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a).  CBM2012-00002, Paper 66 (Jan. 23, 2014).  The PTAB found that the Challenger met its burden of proving, by a preponderance of the evidence, each of the three grounds of invalidity on which the PTAB instituted the review.   More
PDF version


Design Patents
Inconsistent Girdles Present Major Hurdles: Poor-Quality Drawings Lead to Invalid Design Patents
Read

Rule Review
“Natural” Exceptions to Subject Matter Eligibility: New USPTO Guidance
Read

EPO Practice
A View of the USPTO Myriad Guidance from Europe
Read

At the Federal Circuit
“A” Does Not Always Encompass “One”—Federal Circuit Reads “Population” into a Claim
Read



Finnegan
  Follow us on


DISCLAIMER: The information contained herein is intended to convey general information only and should not be construed as a legal opinion or as legal advice. The firm disclaims liability for any errors or omissions and readers should not take any action that relies upon the information contained in this newsletter. You should consult your own lawyer concerning your own situation and any specific legal questions. This promotional newsletter does not establish any form of attorney-client relationship with our firm or with any of our attorneys.

If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact:

Eric P. Raciti, Editor-in-Chief
Elizabeth A. Doherty, Ph.D., Associate Editor
J. Derek McCorquindale, Associate Editor

Atlanta ▪ Boston ▪ London ▪ Palo Alto ▪ Reston ▪ Shanghai ▪ Taipei ▪ Tokyo ▪ Washington, DC
www.finnegan.com
Copyright © 2014 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP | All rights reserved