Associate
David advises the law firm community and clients on e-discovery best practices, emerging issues, and trends. He has significant experience in all aspects of discovery, including responding to discovery requests, drafting pre-trial orders, briefing motions, assisting with deposition preparation, and deposing fact witnesses.
David also manages the establishment of data preservation, collection and processing protocols with in-house IT departments, litigation support and external vendors in complex litigation matters. He actively contributes to developing internal course materials and conducts ongoing training sessions regarding substantive and strategic areas of discovery for litigation/controversy matters.
David shares the firm's commitment to pro bono work and the firm's Veteran's Assistance Program. He has represented clients on a pro bono basis in the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC), including a successful veteran's disability rating appeal, which resulted in obtaining a 100% disability rating for the veteran.
Certain Electronic Devices with Communication Capabilities, Components Thereof, and Related Software
Involved in representing complainant HTC in an investigation involving certain user interface features in Apple’s iPhones, iPads, and iPod Touches.
337-TA-808, ITC, Judge Gildea
Certain Computing Devices with Associated Instruction Sets and Software
Represented VIA Technologies and Centaur in ITC investigation against Apple asserting infringement of microprocessor architectures and the instruction sets associated with microprocessors. Served in a leading role on the team representing Via and Centaur, taking and defending witness testimony at deposition. The case settled favorably prior to an initial determination.
337-TA-812, ITC, Judge Pender
Astellas Pharma U.S., Inc. v. Sicor, Inc.
Represented Astellas in an action to prevent generic competition in pharmacological heart stress agent Adenoscan®. Tried and settled favorably to patent holder after trial.
1:05-cv-00336, -00337, D. Del., Judge Robinson
Eli Lilly & Co. v. Wockhardt Ltd.
Represented Eli Lilly in Hatch-Waxman patent infringement litigations against several ANDA filers seeking FDA approval to market generic versions of Eli Lilly's Cymbalta®. The S.D. Indiana entered judgment before trial in favor of Eli Lilly and against all the ANDA filers on all issues, resulting in orders and judgment maintaining Cymbalta's® market exclusivity through the end of its patent life.
1:08-cv-01547, S.D. Ind., Judges Baker, Lawrence, Pratt
Certain Video Game Machines and Related Three-Dimensional Pointing Devices
Represented complainant Hillcrest Laboratories against Nintendo's Wii video game system for infringement of Hillcrest's fundamental patents on 3D pointing technology; settled favorably after full evidentiary hearing but before ALJ's initial determination.
337-TA-658, ITC, Judge Luckern
elcommerce.com, Inc. v. SAP AG
Represented SAP in a patent litigation and subsequent appeal involving software products; Obtained a stipulated judgment of non-infringement in light of the court's Markman ruling.
2:09-cv-04458, E.D. Pa., Judge Dubois
11-1369, Fed. Cir., Judges Newman, Plager, Wallach
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.