On 23 June 2016, the UK public voted to leave the European Union (EU). Despite voting to leave the EU, the UK will continue to abide by EU treaties and laws for at least the next two years, or for as long as it takes for withdrawal agreements to be negotiated and new terms established with the 27 remaining EU member countries.
During these next few years it will become clearer how the impact of leaving the EU will affect European intellectual property rights. Of particular significance is whether the UK decides to join other trade agreements, such as the European Free Trade Agreement, or be a part of the European Economic Area.
This vote does not affect the ability of Finnegan to represent its clients in Europe and the UK.
Below is a summary of what this vote means for IP rights:
Nothing changes. The outcome of the referendum has no effect on the UK’s membership of the European Patent Convention (EPC). The European Patent Office (EPO) is not an EU institution and will still be able to grant European patents that can be validated in the UK. Representation rights of British European patent attorneys before the EPO remain unaffected.
The UK leaving the EU does not affect the European patent system, nor does it affect the UK as a party to the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT). Direct UK patent applications and PCT-UK national phase patent applications can still be filed at the UKIPO.
Until withdrawal from the EU is completed, all European rights will continue to have effect in the UK. Whilst the UK forms its position independent from the EU it is expected that a transitional procedure will be negotiated which will enable EU trade marks and Community designs to be converted into UK national registrations.
The decision to leave the European Union does not affect UK national intellectual property rights.
It is expected that any provision established to convert EU rights into UK national rights is likely to re-set the period during which use must be made of a mark to prevent vulnerability to cancellation of a trade mark on the basis of non-use. This will allow rights holders with the intent to use marks in the UK, who had previously relied upon use elsewhere in the EU to maintain the validity of their rights, to commence use of the mark.
Should you require further information, please contact your Finnegan attorney.
Copyright © Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. This article is for informational purposes, is not intended to constitute legal advice, and may be considered advertising under applicable state laws. This article is only the opinion of the authors and is not attributable to Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, or the firm's clients.
Lecture
Patent Protection for Software-Related Inventions in Europe and the USA Training Course
June 5, 2024
Hybrid
Workshop
Life Sciences Workshop: Updates and Key Trends in Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology IP Law
May 2, 2024
Cambridge
Conference
Best Practices in Intellectual Property– A Decade of Dedication to IP Excellence
April 8-9, 2024
Tel Aviv
INCONTESTABLE® Blog
Winning the Battle but Not the War: Disclaimer Requirement Overturned, Section 2(d) Objection Upheld
March 28, 2024
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.