Experience
Princeton Digital Image Corp.
Harmonix Music Systems, Inc.
After Harmonix was sued by Princeton Digital Image Corp. in D. Delaware, Finnegan filed a request for inter partes review (IPR) on behalf of Harmonix against all asserted claims. Shortly after filing, Finnegan obtained a rare pre-institution stay of the litigation for Harmonix and other defendants sued over the same patent, avoiding potentially substantial discovery costs. The PTAB issued its final written decision finding four patent claims unpatentable on both proposed § 102 grounds.
Harmonix Music Systems, Inc. v. Princeton Digital Image Corp., IPR2014-00155, PTAB, Judges Osinki, Ward, Wood
Princeton Digital Image Corp. v. Harmonix Music Systems, Inc., 1:12-cv-01461, D. Del., Judges Stark, Burke
McRo, Inc. (Planet Blue) v. Harmonix Music Systems, Inc.
Harmonix Music Systems, Inc.
SplitFish AG, SplitFish Gameware, Inc., and Nabon Corp.
Finnegan client successfully uses CBM to invalidate a competitor’s patents
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.; Metavante Corporation
FIS successfully uses PTAB to invalidate quintessential “Business Method Patents”
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS)
BMW et al.
Promethean Limited v. FlatFrog Laboratories AB
FlatFrog Laboratories AB
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.