In its final written decision on October 15, 2015, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) found that the United States Postal Service (USPS) had proven that a patent held by Return Mail Inc. (RMI), which covers a method of handling return mail items, is invalid for claiming only abstract ideas under the Supreme Court's Alice decision. RMI sued the USPS in 2011 alleging unlicensed use of the patent when it incorporated the return mail technology into its own system. In April 2014, the USPS petitioned the PTAB for inter partes review, requesting a covered business method patent review of six of the claims.
Media Mention
Women in Business Law Americas Awards 2024: Three Finnegan Attorneys Shortlisted
April 7, 2024
Press Release
Finnegan and BMW Group Successfully Demolish Non-Practicing Entity NorthStar’s Efforts
April 3, 2024
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.