July 15, 2015
Managing Intellectual Property
Managing Intellectual Property referenced Finnegan's Incontestable Blog post in its July 15 article discussing the Multi Time Machine v. Amazon.com case. Multi Time Machine (MTM) makes Special Ops watches, which are a type of military-style watches that are not sold on Amazon. However, if a customer searches "MTM Special Ops" on Amazon's website, the search results show similar watches made by MTM's competitors, rather than informing customers that are no search results for "MTM Special Ops" and then displaying competitor products. MTM believes that displaying the search results in this matter will cause confusion for the customer. A Ninth Circuit panel was not certain that MTM would be able to prove the "initial interest confusion" theory, but the panel did suggest that clear labeling could eliminate the likelihood of confusion.
Media Mention
Women in Business Law Americas Awards 2024: Three Finnegan Attorneys Shortlisted
April 7, 2024
Press Release
Finnegan and BMW Group Successfully Demolish Non-Practicing Entity NorthStar’s Efforts
April 3, 2024
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.