September 28, 2016
Webinar
Intellectual Property Owners Association (IPO)
As part of an IPO webinar series, Finnegan partner Eric P. Raciti will participate in a webinar discussion on patent prosecution practice since last year's en banc Federal Circuit decision in Williamson v. Citrix, covering the criteria used by the USPTO to decide whether a claim invokes Section 112(f) and what structural disclosure is enough to support such a claim. Panelists will also discuss the pros and cons of having a claim fall under Section 112(f) considering recent tighter application of Sections 112(b) and Section 101, the latest on best practices for prosecuting patents, and the concern that patents still being approved by the USPTO might not pass muster in litigation. For more information, or to register, please see the IPO's website.
indefiniteness (35 USC § 112), 35 U.S.C. § 101, Williamson v. Citrix Online, means-plus-function claim
Lecture
Patent Protection for Software-Related Inventions in Europe and the USA Training Course
June 5, 2024
Hybrid
Workshop
Life Sciences Workshop: Updates and Key Trends in Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology IP Law
May 2, 2024
Cambridge
INCONTESTABLE® Blog
April 19, 2024
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.