Experience
Chef’n Corp.
Trudeau Corp.
In this case involving a design patent, Chef’n Corporation accused Finnegan client Trudeau Corp. of infringing a patent for a silicone vegetable steamer. The Western District of Washington granted summary judgment of no infringement in favor of Trudeau. As part of the order, Judge Pechman also granted Trudeau’s motion to strike the declarations of two industry experts produced by Chef’n. Earlier in the case, Trudeau successfully defeated Chef’n’s motion for a preliminary injunction.
Chef’n Corp. v. Trudeau Corp., 2:08-cv-01135, W.D. Wash., Judge Pechman
Summary judgment of patent invalidity granted in favor of Finnegan client SinterFire Corporation
SinterFire Corp.
Summary judgment of immunity from infringement granted in favor of Accuride Corporation
Accuride Corp.
Interference decision reversed in favor of Phillips’s defibrillator patent
Koninklijke Philips Electronics
Toyota Motor Corp.
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP
Zymogenetics, Inc. v. Immunex Corp.
Immunex Corp.
Koninklijke Philips Electronics, N.V. v. Cardiac Science Operating Co.
Koninklijke Philips Electronics, N.V.
Toyota Motor Corp.
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.