直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
    • AI + Finnegan
    • Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
    • Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
    • Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
    • Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
    • Prosecution and Portfolio Management
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • Life Sciences
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • Experience

Experience

Summary judgment of immunity from infringement granted in favor of Accuride Corporation

Hutchinson Industries

Accuride Corp.

In an important decision for companies bidding on government contracts or supplying bidders on government contracts, Judge Freda L. Wolfson of the District of New Jersey issued an order granting summary judgment of immunity from infringement in favor of Finnegan client Accuride Corporation.  Accuride was accused of infringing a patent on an automotive wheel for use with an onboard tire inflation system.  Accuride supplied the accused wheel to companies bidding on a U.S. Army solicitation for a military all-terrain vehicle (M-ATV) intended to better protect U.S. soldiers, sailors, airman, and marines in Afghanistan from roadside bombs and improvised explosive devices (IEDs).  In a detailed 29-page opinion, Judge Wolfson found that the U.S. Government had implicitly authorized and consented to liability for any potentially infringing onboard tire inflation system when wheels were supplied in the bidding phase of the M-ATV military contract.  Specifically, Judge Wolfson found that Accuride was immune from any liability for patent infringement under 28 U.S.C. § 1498(a), which is the federal statute that provides that claims for patent infringement occurring in government contracts must be against government and must be brought in the Court of Federal Claims.

Hutchinson Industries v. Accuride Corp., 3:09-cv-01489, D.N.J., Judges Goodman, Wolfson

Related Practices

Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials

Pretrial Strategies

Related Industries

Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials

Manufacturing

Transportation and Logistics

Automotive and Smart Mobility Tech

Related Experiences

Summary judgment of no infringement granted in favor of Trudeau Corporation

Trudeau Corp.

Summary judgment of patent invalidity granted in favor of Finnegan client SinterFire Corporation

SinterFire Corp.

District court grants summary judgment in favor of AstraZeneca finding invalid all asserted claims against anti-cholesterol drug Crestor®

AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP

District court grants summary judgment of noninfringement for Finnegan client Toyota against Solomon Technologies, Inc.

Toyota Motor Corp.

Experience_Bridgestone_achieves_summary_judgment_victories_in_two_separate_licensing_and_infringement_disputes

Bridgestone achieves summary judgment victories in two separate licensing and infringement disputes

Bridgestone

Federal Circuit affirms claim construction and summary judgment of noninfringement in favor of Finnegan client Pergo

Pergo LLC

FedEx granted summary judgment in multi-district litigation resolving all claims against Katz

FedEx Corp.

Finnegan trade secret case resolved with favorable summary judgment for client RichWave

RichWave Technology Corporation

Summary judgment allows Home Diagnostics Inc. (HDI) to meet the needs of diabetics

Home Diagnostics Inc. (HDI)

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP