Experience
Whirlpool Corp.
LG Electronics, Inc.
In an ITC Section 337 action between Finnegan client LG Electronics and its competitor Whirlpool, the ITC denied all of Whirlpool’s claims for relief, resulting in a total victory for LG Electronics. Judge Theodore R. Essex had previously ruled that LG refrigerators are not covered by Whirlpool's U.S. Patent No. 6,082,130. The ITC later revised the claim interpretation of the ‘130 patent and asked the judge to reconsider the remaining disputed issues based on its new interpretation. Judge Essex applied the ITC’s interpretation and again found that the ‘130 patent does not cover LG refrigerators and also concluded that all but one of the asserted claims is invalid. Whirlpool originally claimed that five of its patents covered LG refrigerators. During the course of the case, Whirlpool withdrew four of those patents prior to the hearing.
Certain Refrigerators, 337-TA-632, ITC, Judge Essex
Certain Products Containing Interactive Program Guide and Parental Control Technology
LG Electronics, Inc.
Certain LTE Wireless Communication Devices and Components Thereof
LG Electronics, Inc.
Certain Point-to-Point Network Communication Devices; Straight Path IP Group v. LG Electronics, Inc.
LG Electronics
Jury finds non-infringement and non-willfulness in LG Electronics refrigerator patents case
LG Electronics
Certain Semiconductor Devices and Consumer Audiovisual Products Containing the Same
LG Electronics, Inc.
Finnegan secures favorable ITC ruling related to innovative electric SUVs for BMW
BMW of North America, LLC and Bayerische Motoren Werke AG
LG Electronics, Inc.
Global litigation strategy results in global settlement
LG Electronics
Certain Vision-Based Driver Assistance System Cameras and Components Thereof
Mobileye, Inc., Magna Electronics, Inc. et al.
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.