When you retain Finnegan, our entire firm becomes part of your team. All of our expertise, our reputation, and our experience, both legal and technical, are brought to bear in deciding how to approach your case. We begin with frank and honest conversations, timely and judicious discovery, careful analysis of the potential risks and rewards, and a mapping of the strengths and weaknesses of your position. We listen carefully to better understand your business objectives, your options, your risk tolerance, and your ultimate goals. We then develop a team approach and strategy that best meets your needs.
We understand that the realities of litigation can be daunting, so we work with clients to find enterprising solutions that are both cost-effective and case-effective. Historically, most cases involving intellectual property never go to trial. Thus, while we litigate with a potential trial or appeal in mind, our vision is to resolve each case successfully as soon and as economically as possible. This may mean pursuing litigation alternatives, such as licensing, mediation, or arbitration, or a companion proceeding before another court or administrative agency. Or you may decide that settlement is the best resolution.
As a case proceeds, we can adjust our deployment of resources as needed. There are multiple ways to approach any given IP case. The most important factor is that we remain flexible and committed to your goals throughout.
337-TA-1267, ITC, Judge Bhattacharyya
IPR2021-01321, -01531, PTAB, Judges Baer, Fenick, Iftikhar
2:21-cv-00054; -00172, E.D. Tex., Judge Gilstrap
1:19-cv-01570, E.D. Va., Judge O'Grady
6:20-cv-00894, -00895, -00896, -00897, W.D. Tex., Judge Albright
6:20-cv-01080, W.D. Tex., Judge Albright
IPR2021-00214, -00215, -00216; PGR2021-00010, -00090, PTAB, Judges Kalan, Ross, Kaiser
3:20-cv-00603, D. Nev., Judge Du
IPR2021-00951, -00952, -00953, PTAB
1:21-cv-00607, D. Del., Judge Andrews
1:20-cv-02802, S.D. Ind., Judges Pratt, Dinsmore
Commentary
Behind the Case: How Finnegan Helped Eli Lilly Swerve a $176.5M Patent Headache
October 10, 2023
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.