Experience
Paradox Security Systems, Ltd.
ADT Security Systems, Inc. and Digital Security Controls, Ltd.
On the third day of trial in the Eastern District of Texas, the judge directed a verdict against the plaintiffs and in favor of Finnegan clients ADT Security Systems, Inc. and Digital Security Controls, Ltd. on all claims. The plaintiffs were seeking damages for the alleged infringement of a patent relating to a telephone line coupler circuit. The judge’s ruling for the defendants followed in the wake of a number of favorable rulings on pretrial motions that narrowed the scope of the case.
Paradox Security Systems, Ltd. v. ADT Security Systems, Inc. and Digital Security Controls, Ltd., 2:06-cv-00462, E.D. Tex., Judge Ward
Paradox Security Systems, Ltd. v. ADT Security Services, Inc.
ADT Security Services, Inc.; Digital Security Controls
Eastern District of Texas invalidates patent asserted against Finnegan client FedEx Corporation
FedEx Corp.
Parental Guide of Texas, Inc. v. Funai Corporation, Inc. et al.
Philips Electronics
Ningde Amperex Technology Limited v. Zhuhai CosMX Battery Co., Ltd.
Zhuhai CosMX Battery Co., Ltd.
District court enters judgment of noninfringement for Finnegan client Philips
Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
Settlement achieved for Boeing
The Boeing Company
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.