Experience
Paradox Security Systems, Ltd.
ADT Security Systems, Inc. and Digital Security Controls, Ltd.
On the third day of trial in the Eastern District of Texas, the judge directed a verdict against the plaintiffs and in favor of Finnegan clients ADT Security Systems, Inc. and Digital Security Controls, Ltd. on all claims. The plaintiffs were seeking damages for the alleged infringement of a patent relating to a telephone line coupler circuit. The judge’s ruling for the defendants followed in the wake of a number of favorable rulings on pretrial motions that narrowed the scope of the case.
Paradox Security Systems, Ltd. v. ADT Security Systems, Inc. and Digital Security Controls, Ltd., 2:06-cv-00462, E.D. Tex., Judge Ward
Paradox Security Systems, Ltd. v. ADT Security Services, Inc.
ADT Security Services, Inc.; Digital Security Controls
Eastern District of Texas invalidates patent asserted against Finnegan client FedEx Corporation
FedEx Corp.
Parental Guide of Texas, Inc. v. Funai Corporation, Inc. et al.
Philips Electronics
District court enters judgment of noninfringement for Finnegan client Philips
Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
Settlement achieved for Boeing
The Boeing Company
Acclarent; Exploramed II Incorporated
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.