Partner
Lionel Lavenue is a battle-tested patent trial lawyer who relentlessly defends and enforces intellectual property (IP) in consequential disputes facing technology-driven businesses. He has served as lead or first chair counsel in more than 220 patent cases, including 22 bench and jury trials, and in nearly a dozen cases involving trade secrets. Lionel has a reputation for launching multifront defense campaigns for innovative companies targeted by non-practicing entities (NPEs). These efforts have resulted in the dismissal of multiple high-value patent claims, saving clients millions in potential damages. Lionel has led the filing of nearly 200 inter partes review (IPR) petitions and ex parte reexaminations (EPR), applying maximum pressure on opposing patents. He has extensive experience in major patent venues, including the Eastern District of Texas, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), and the U.S. Court of Federal Claims (COFC), as well as with arbitration proceedings. His trial-hardened litigation acumen is reinforced by deep patent portfolio and prosecution work, allowing Lionel to align courtroom strategy with long-term enforcement, licensing, and competitive positioning objectives for clients.
Lionel has argued dozens of Markman hearings. He has directed the discovery for numerous complex cases and disputes, and he has taken or defended over 250 depositions. He also has briefed and argued numerous patent/IP appeals at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Lionel’s extensive experience with innovation capture and patent/IP protection includes the preparation of over 2,500 patent applications. He has organized and managed numerous large domestic and foreign patent portfolios. His prosecution experience covers an array of technologies, including those related to the financial services, electrical, aerospace, and automotive industries. Lionel works directly with leading innovators in the artificial intelligence (AI) sector, alongside related fields such as automotive technologies and robotics. This includes counseling on patent applications, opinions, and litigation for AI-related inventions, where Lionel leverages his extensive background in software and computer-implemented technologies, which often overlap with AI systems (e.g., machine learning algorithms, data processing, and automated decision-making).
Lionel’s practice includes litigation, patent applications, and opinion work related to business methods, computers, software, and electrical and mechanical devices (including medical devices, especially medical device software applications). He has also directed numerous ex parte and inter partes patent reexamination proceedings, including almost 100 “defensive reexaminations” used during litigations. As one of the first to challenge a patent via the inter partes review (IPR) procedure, he has led the filing of almost 200 IPR petitions and covered business method (CBM) petitions.
Lionel has particular insight into patent disputes involving government contracts, including patent infringement claims under 28 U.S.C. § 1498, with extensive experience with numerous cases before the U.S. Court of Federal Claims. He holds Public Trust clearance, and previously held Top Secret and Code Word clearances.
Lionel routinely lectures to bar associations and aviation groups on patent law issues related to aircraft, rotorcraft, soaring, skydiving, and lighter-than-air technologies. He is an active and current airplane and helicopter pilot (and occasional glider and balloon pilot), and he counsels many aviation and aerospace companies on IP issues. Lionel also has extensive experience with drone, UAV, and UAS technologies. As a Fulbright Scholar, Lionel participated in a visiting scholar program at the Max Planck Institute in Munich, Germany, focusing on the study of foreign and international patent, copyright, and competition law. He has been recognized by Managing Intellectual Property (MIP) as a “Patent Star” on both the national and regional (Virginia) levels as well as by Intellectual Asset Management (IAM) for his practice in the DC region.
Lionel and his wife are alpine mountaineers, skydivers, and adventurers. Of the Seven Summits (the highest peaks of the seven continents), they have summited six (Mt. Kilimanjaro in Africa in 1999; Mt. Elbrus in Russia in 2002; Mt. Aconcagua in South America in 2002; Mt. McKinley in North America and Mt. Vinson in Antarctica in 2004; and Mt. Kosciuszko in Oceania in 2007) and plans to finish the seventh of the Seven Summits, with Mt. Everest scheduled for 2028/2029. Lionel is an experienced skydiver (with over 1750 relative-work formation skydives) and holds numerous skydiving world records. He and his wife are scheduled on an early commercial space flight, with World View, in 2027/2028.
Lionel works with leading innovators across technology markets including those in the automotive, robotics, and artificial intelligence spaces. Lionel has extensive experience with both front end and back end features of mobile apps, including applications of object-oriented design, HTML5 architecture, the Angular, Apache Kafka, and MICRON frameworks, and BIAN. He has represented Boeing in patent matters relating to aircraft software products; represented Bosch both in patent enforcement and in the defense of multiple patent infringement lawsuits related to various electronic and mechanical technologies; defended various LG entities in multiple patent infringement lawsuits, primarily in the E.D. Texas, involving electronic, mechanical, and telecommunication technologies; and defended Sony in multiple patent infringement lawsuits in the E.D. Texas, N.D. California, and C.D. California, involving electronic, software, and mechanical technologies, as well as in arbitration issues before the Japan Commercial Arbitration Association (JCAA). He has also represented the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) and governmental entities in protecting, defending, and enforcing mechanical, electronic, and software innovations.
18-2003, Fed. Cir., Judges Newman, Prost, Chen
6:11-cv-00278, E.D. Tex., Judges Davis, Love
1:11-cv-00930, -00931, D. Del., Judge Sleet
2:13-cv-11407, -11410, E.D. Mich., Judges Duggan, Roberts, Grand, Randon
1:20-cv-01907, N.D. Ga., Judge Grimberg
IPR2017-01938, -01939, -01940, 01941, PTAB, Judges Margolies, Easthom, Zado
2:12-cv-00042, E.D. Tex., Judges Folsom, Gilstrap, Schneider, Craven
3:13-cv-01296, D. Or., Judges Hernandez, Acosta
4:08-cv-04567, N.D. Cal., Judges Wilken, Laporte, Larson
337-TA-666, ITC, Judge Gildea
After forcing Stragent to willfully concede in open court that it could not present enough evidence to prove infringement of its asserted patents, which Stragent read on the automotive communications standard AUTOSAR, Finnegan vigorously negotiated for BMW a royalty-free license to Stragent’s entire patent portfolio. Successfully invalidated multiple Stragent patents before the Patent Office, with one victory on appeal and additional IPR petitions pending at the time of case resolution.
1:20-cv-00510, D. Del., Judge Wolson
1:23-cv-00005, D. Del., Judge Wolson
IPR2023-00333, -00334, PTAB
22-2062 , Fed. Cir.
IPR2021-00417, -00418, -00419, PTAB, Judges Galligan, Repko, White
Ericsson Inc. v. TCL Communication Technology
TCL hired Finnegan to handle the appeal of an unfavorable judgment of willful infringement at the Eastern District of Texas, which resulted in a massive damages award of over $110 million. After Finnegan tenaciously convinced the Federal Circuit that the claims were patent ineligible under 35 U.S.C. § 101, the court reversed the district court’s ruling of no invalidity, vacated the entire judgment against TCL, and awarded costs to TCL. Based on that award, Finnegan further persuaded the trial court to tax $2.35 million in costs.
18-2003, Fed. Cir., Judges Newman, Prost, Chen
Stragent, LLC v. BMW of North America, LLC
Aggressively defended BMW against Stragent in a patent infringement case involving voice recognition technology that resulted in complete dismissal with prejudice following a favorable claim construction order.
6:11-cv-00278, E.D. Tex., Judges Davis, Love
Beacon Navigation, GmbH v. BMW of North America, LLC
Wholly obtained transfer of patent infringement lawsuit from D. Delaware to E.D. Michigan (and, later, a stay of litigation) on behalf of BMW in cases involving GPS tracking and interface technology.
1:11-cv-00930, -00931, D. Del., Judge Sleet
2:13-cv-11407, -11410, E.D. Mich., Judges Duggan, Roberts, Grand, Randon
Carrum Technologies, LLC v. BMW of North America, LLC, et al.
Successfully obtained complete and total victory against Carrum on appeal of the District of Delaware’s claim construction to the Federal Circuit following Carrum’s stipulation of non-infringement under the claim construction, thereby exonerating BMW’s ACC system, first sold in 2000, against Carrum’s 2004 patents. Strategically invalidated several asserted claims through post-grant efforts before the U.S. Patent Office, including IPRs and EPRs, and pursued claims through proceedings before the Eastern District of Virginia to vindicate BMW’s patent challenges.
1:18-cv-01645, D. Del., Judge Andrews
21-1435, 24-1480, Fed. Cir., Judges Clevenger, Cunningham, Lourie, Moore, Prost, Taranto
IPR2019-00902, -00903, -00904, -00905, -00927, 00928, PTAB, Judges Browne, Scanlon, Tornquist
90/019,010, CRU
Patent drafting and prosecution for CentralSquare’s AI technologies
Finnegan is honored and tremendously proud to partner with CentralSquare in developing and protecting its mission-critical software and technology solutions for public sector agencies, including those serving public safety and public administration. Our dynamic team has led the drafting and prosecution of a broad portfolio of artificial intelligence (AI)-related patent applications, advancing CentralSquare’s innovations across emergency services and municipal operations. These AI technologies accelerate emergency response, streamline workflows, and strengthen data-driven decision-making for agencies and the communities they serve.
Working diligently and closely with CentralSquare’s inventors and in-house counsel, we ensure every application captures the technical depth of the invention while aligning with CentralSquare’s strategic goals. We fully prioritize clarity, enforceability, and foresight—refining claims, anticipating examiner challenges, and crafting robust Office Action responses. By anticipating industry trends in AI and preparing forward-looking applications, Finnegan thoroughly positions CentralSquare’s innovations not only to be protected, but also to drive lasting impact in public safety and beyond.
IP Updates
EPR Academy: ALERT – USPTO Introduces New EPR Pre-order Procedure for Determination in Ex Parte Reexaminations EPR Academy: ALERT – USPTO Introduces New EPR Pre-order Procedure for Determination in Ex Parte Reexaminations
April 3, 2026
Articles
Preempting Surprise Injunctions in Germany and the UPC: Strategic Use of the Schutzschrift in Global Patent Litigation Preempting Surprise Injunctions in Germany and the UPC: Strategic Use of the Schutzschrift in Global Patent Litigation
March 27, 2026
Articles
Patent Ruling Shows Quiet Power of State-Law Bad-Faith Statutes Patent Ruling Shows Quiet Power of State-Law Bad-Faith Statutes
February 20, 2026
Bloomberg LawArticles
EPR Academy, Part 3 of 6: The EPR Appeals Process EPR Academy, Part 3 of 6: The EPR Appeals Process
February 19, 2026
"Lionel Lavenue is a terrific patent litigator. He earnestly provides thoughtful advice and always puts his clients’ needs first. I have never been wanting for a response or document when working with Lionel. I very much appreciate his candour and creative solutions to problems. Lionel is truly one of a kind."
Intellectual Asset Management Patent 1000
“Lionel is always focused on winning a case. He manages the most complex litigation easily and is excellent at working under pressure. Lionel’s presence is comforting for the client and frightening for the adversary. In short, he enjoys fighting and winning.”
Intellectual Asset Management Patent 1000
"Lionel Lavenue is an extremely smart and experienced lead partner. A great patent attorney with impressive technical competences. Our outside impression is that he leads his case teams extremely well, and his staff enjoy working with him. We certainly do."
The Legal 500 U.S.
“James Barney, Lionel Lavenue and Doris Johnson Hines have all engaged in Section 337 investigations recently and are three of the best all-round patent litigators on deck.”
Intellectual Asset Management Patent 1000
"Lionel Lavenue is a terrific patent litigator. He earnestly provides thoughtful advice and always puts his clients’ needs first. I have never been wanting for a response or document when working with Lionel. I very much appreciate his candour and creative solutions to problems. Lionel is truly one of a kind."
Intellectual Asset Management Patent 1000
“Lionel is always focused on winning a case. He manages the most complex litigation easily and is excellent at working under pressure. Lionel’s presence is comforting for the client and frightening for the adversary. In short, he enjoys fighting and winning.”
Intellectual Asset Management Patent 1000
"Lionel Lavenue is an extremely smart and experienced lead partner. A great patent attorney with impressive technical competences. Our outside impression is that he leads his case teams extremely well, and his staff enjoy working with him. We certainly do."
The Legal 500 U.S.
“James Barney, Lionel Lavenue and Doris Johnson Hines have all engaged in Section 337 investigations recently and are three of the best all-round patent litigators on deck.”
Intellectual Asset Management Patent 1000
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Earns Top Rankings in 2026 IAM Patent 1000 Guide; Nearly 60 Attorneys Ranked Finnegan Earns Top Rankings in 2026 IAM Patent 1000 Guide; Nearly 60 Attorneys Ranked
May 28, 2026
Intellectual Asset Management (IAM)Press Release
Finnegan Secures Decisive ITC Victory for Innoscience in Final Determination Finnegan Secures Decisive ITC Victory for Innoscience in Final Determination
May 11, 2026
Commentary
ITC Bars Import of Innoscience Chips Made Before Redesign ITC Bars Import of Innoscience Chips Made Before Redesign
May 8, 2026
Law360Press Release
Pvtech Secures Stay of New Jersey District Court Litigation Following USPTO Institution of All 10 Ex Parte Reexamination Requests Against Patents Asserted by Jiaxing Super Lighting Pvtech Secures Stay of New Jersey District Court Litigation Following USPTO Institution of All 10 Ex Parte Reexamination Requests Against Patents Asserted by Jiaxing Super Lighting
April 28, 2026
Press Release
Pvtech Achieves Perfect Record at USPTO: Institution of All 10 of 10 Ex Parte Reexamination Petitions Against Patents Asserted by Jiaxing Super Lighting Pvtech Achieves Perfect Record at USPTO: Institution of All 10 of 10 Ex Parte Reexamination Petitions Against Patents Asserted by Jiaxing Super Lighting
April 24, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.