直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
Jeffrey D. Smyth
Partner
More
vCard
  • Stanford Research Park
  • 3300 Hillview Avenue, 2nd Floor
  • Palo Alto, CA 94304-1203
+1 650 849 6618
jeffrey.smyth@finnegan.com jeffrey.smyth@finnegan.com

Jeffrey D. Smyth

Partner

  • +1 650 849 6618 +1 650 849 6618
  • jeffrey.smyth@finnegan.com jeffrey.smyth@finnegan.com
  • Stanford Research Park
  • 3300 Hillview Avenue, 2nd Floor
  • Palo Alto, CA 94304-1203
  • vCard

Jeffrey Smyth focuses on intellectual property litigation across a diverse range of fields, with a particular emphasis on cases involving pharmaceutical and life sciences technologies. He employs a meticulous and innovative approach to resolving disputes before U.S. district courts, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and arbitration tribunals, often when clients’ most important assets are at stake.
 

Jeffrey handles complex disputes involving patents and trade secrets in various technological domains. While he frequently leverages his expertise in cell biology and biochemistry for matters within the life sciences, he has also litigated cases concerning electrical and mechanical inventions. His recent engagements include work on technologies related to gene therapies and enzyme replacement therapies aimed at treating rare genetic disorders.

Jeffrey is proficient in all facets of U.S. district court litigation, including conducting jury trials and appeals before the Federal Circuit. Additionally, he has litigated patent validity issues before the PTAB, participated in arbitration proceedings under the American Arbitration Association (AAA), and has devoted time to various pro bono initiatives.

Prior to his legal career, Jeffrey worked in the laboratory at Dynavax Technologies, Inc., conducting early-stage vaccine research and development projects. His work involved ELISA antibody assay development, vaccine formulation testing, and protein production in E. coli. During his undergraduate studies, Jeffrey worked in an academic laboratory searching for genetic mutations in the Arabidopsis Thaliana plant model using PCR and DNA sequencing techniques.

Et Cetera

  • Editor of the Santa Clara Computer and High Technology Journal, 2010-2011.
  • Served as president of the Santa Clara Biotechnology Law Group, 2010-2011.

Experience

Genzyme Corporation et al. v. Novartis Gene Therapies, Inc. et al.

Defended Novartis against Genzyme’s multiple patent infringement actions and inter partes review (IPR) proceedings related to recombinant adeno-associated virus vector technology used in Novartis’ blockbuster, breakthrough gene therapy Zolgensma®. The case settled after four patents were invalidated during claim construction, five patents found not literally infringed, and institution of multiple IPRs.

1:21-cv-01736, 1:23-cv-00554, D. Del., Judge Andrews

Trade secret and breach of contract dispute resolved with favorable settlement for Finnegan client Meati Foods

Finnegan represented Emergy, Inc., d/b/a Meati Foods in a trade secret misappropriation, breach of contract, and correction of inventorship case against The Better Meat Company (BMC) and Augustus Pattillo involving alternative meat made from mycelium.

Emergy alleged that Augustus Pattillo stole its trade secrets on the cultivation and production of mycelium that he learned while working as a lab technician for Emergy’s founders, misused them in his work with BMC, breached his nondisclosure agreement with Emergy, and improperly filed patent applications on Emergy’s technology and assigned them to BMC.

BMC filed claims of tortious interference and unfair competition against Emergy, which Emergy succeeded in striking under California’s anti-Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPP) statute. After prevailing under the anti-SLAPP statute, Emergy was statutorily entitled to recover its reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs for defending against BMC’s stricken claims of tortious interference and unfair competition

Early in the litigation, Emergy defeated BMC’s motion to dismiss Emergy’s trade secret misappropriation and breach of implied contract claims. Emergy later defeated BMC’s motion for summary judgment on Emergy’s trade secret misappropriation, breach of contract, and breach of implied contract claims. The case settled soon after the Court issued its summary judgment ruling.

2-21-cv-02338, E.D. Cal., Judge Mueller
2-21-cv-02417, E.D. Cal., Judge Mueller

Genzyme Corp. v. CSRC et al.

Represented CSRC in two arbitrations and one litigation relating to exclusive licenses and patent assignments for patents directed to treating Pompe Disease, a rare genetic disorder that is often fatal if untreated. Secured a $180 million settlement from Genzyme.

01-19-0001-6937; 01-20-0000-5081, AAA

Asetek Danmark A/S v. CMI USA, Inc.

Member of trial team that secured successful jury verdict for client, Asetek, in a case against a competitor selling infringing computer cooling systems. Jury awarded damages at 14.5% royalty rate and rejected all of CMI USA’s invalidity defenses. Judge imposed enhanced damages for post-trial willful infringement.

3:13-cv-00457, N.D. Cal., Judges Chen, Corley, Tigar

Insights

Conference

ACC SFBA Life Sciences Conference 2026 ACC SFBA Life Sciences Conference 2026

March 10-12, 2026

Virtual

Conference

ACC California Summit ACC California Summit

August 29, 2025

Anaheim

Webinar

Patent Eligibility and Engineered Natural Products: Overcoming 101 Challenges, Leveraging Options for IP Protection Patent Eligibility and Engineered Natural Products: Overcoming 101 Challenges, Leveraging Options for IP Protection

April 17, 2025

Webinar

Conference

IP Leadership Executive Summit 2025 IP Leadership Executive Summit 2025

April 15-16, 2025

San Jose

Conference

California Lawyers Association 48th IP Institute California Lawyers Association 48th IP Institute

March 6-8, 2025

Long Beach

Virtual Seminar

2025 ACC SFBA Life Sciences Conference 2025 ACC SFBA Life Sciences Conference

March 4-6, 2025

Virtual

More

News

Award/Ranking

61 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized on the 2025 Capital Pro Bono Honor Roll 61 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized on the 2025 Capital Pro Bono Honor Roll

May 7, 2026

Award/Ranking

56 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized on the 2024 Capital Pro Bono Honor Roll 56 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized on the 2024 Capital Pro Bono Honor Roll

April 24, 2025

DC Bar

Media Mention

Sanofi Unit To Pay $180M in Disease Treatment Patent Fight Sanofi Unit To Pay $180M in Disease Treatment Patent Fight

November 22, 2021

Law360

Press Release

Finnegan Announces Seven New Partners Finnegan Announces Seven New Partners

January 1, 2020

Media Mention

Fed. Circ. Agrees Prenatal DNA Test Patent Doesn't Hold Up Fed. Circ. Agrees Prenatal DNA Test Patent Doesn't Hold Up

July 10, 2019

Law360

Media Mention

Judge Says CMI Can't Invalidate Asetek Cooling Patents Judge Says CMI Can't Invalidate Asetek Cooling Patents

April 22, 2015

Law360
More

Professional Activities

  • California Lawyers Association, IP Law Section
    (secretary/treasurer, Executive Committee, 2023-present; vice-chair, Cannabis Interest Group, 2023-2024)
  • American Intellectual Property Law Association
    (San Francisco-Bay Area local networking chair, New Lawyer's Committee, 2013-2019)
  • San Francisco Bay Area IP Inn of Court
  • Silicon Valley Intellectual Property Law Association
Admissions and Education

Admissions

  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
  • California
  • U.S. District Court, E.D. California
  • U.S. District Court, D. Colorado
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
  • U.S. District Court, C.D. California
  • U.S. District Court, N.D. California
  • Supreme Court of the United States
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, Veterans Claims
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Education

Santa Clara University School of Law
J.D., 2011
University of California, San Diego
B.S., Biochemistry and Cell Biology, 2005

Jeffrey's Practices

Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
Federal Circuit and Supreme Court Appeals
Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
Arbitration and Other ADR
Branded Hatch-Waxman (ANDA) Litigation and Trials
Federal Circuit and Supreme Court Appeals
Patent Litigation and Trials
Pretrial Strategies
Trade Secrets
Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
PTAB Invalidation Proceedings: IPR and PGR

Jeffrey's Industries

Consumer Goods and Services
Food and Beverage
Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
Sports, Fitness, and Outdoor Recreation
Life Sciences
Biologics
Biotechnology
Pharmaceutical

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP