April 24, 2014
Intellectual Asset Management
This article discusses Nautlis v. Biosig, a case before the U.S. Supreme Court concerning indefiniteness grounds in patent invalidity claims. Finnegan partner James R. Barney provided commentary on the potential impact of the case. “I think the most likely outcome is going to be along the lines of a tweak but even a tweak is going to be an important event,” Barney said. “Just because a patent claim is broad does not mean it is indefinite.”
Media Mention
Women in Business Law Americas Awards 2024: Three Finnegan Attorneys Shortlisted
April 7, 2024
Press Release
Finnegan and BMW Group Successfully Demolish Non-Practicing Entity NorthStar’s Efforts
April 3, 2024
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.