February 26, 2016
Managing Intellectual Property
Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) petition filing has increased every year since the proceedings became available in 2012. However, near the end of 2015, the pace began to slow down and that trend has continued into the first quarter of 2016. Despite the current steady pace of petition filing, the demand for PTAB proceedings is not expected to fade. Several PTAB cases are expected to set the stage in providing clarity on a number of issues.
For example, Cuozzo Speed Technologies v. Lee is expected to have a significant impact. Is it the appeal of the first inter partes review (IPR) ever filed and in January 2016, the Supreme Court granted cert. The Court will rule on the questions of whether the broadest reasonable interpretation (BRI) should be used in IPRs (rather than the Philips standard, which is used in district courts) and whether the PTAB’s decision to institute an IPR is judicially reviewable. Managing Intellectual Property contacted Finnegan attorney Erika H. Arner for her thoughts on the issues in question in the Cuozzo case.
Arner said, "It is very rare that there is a significant difference between the two [standards] that would matter to the outcome of a case. To me, the debate over BRI does seem a bit academic because in so many cases the outcome will be the same whether you use broadest reasonable interpretation or the district court claim construction."
Regarding the second question in Cuozzo as to whether the institution decision is appealable, Arner said, "That is unusual in our system in general. The Federal Circuit and the Patent Office have read that to cover a broad variety of things. So the second question is really asking whether they are reading the statute correctly. If the Patent Office instituted something that is plainly outside its jurisdiction, did Congress really mean the courts can’t help and there is no check on that?"
broadest reasonable interpretation (BRI), Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), Cuozzo Speed Technologies LLC v. Lee
Media Mention
Women in Business Law Americas Awards 2024: Three Finnegan Attorneys Shortlisted
April 7, 2024
Press Release
Finnegan and BMW Group Successfully Demolish Non-Practicing Entity NorthStar’s Efforts
April 3, 2024
Award/Ranking
Managing IP Americas Awards 2024: Finnegan Shortlisted for Nine Awards, Including Firm of the Year
March 12, 2024
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.