Experience
Roberts
Xylem Inc.
Finnegan defended Xylem in a case brought by an individual, Ron Roberts, for alleged misappropriation of an idea for a deodorizing device for marine toilets on boats. Roberts and Xylem had executed a Non-Disclosure Agreement (“NDA”) that specifically excluded from its coverage information in the “public domain” at the time of its disclosure. Roberts then showed Xylem his deodorizing device, and the parties engaged in licensing negotiations for some time. Xylem eventually signed the license agreement, but Roberts never executed the agreement, and instead filed lawsuit against Xylem, claiming the license his UK lawyer negotiated on his behalf was unfair. Roberts alleged idea misappropriation, breach of the NDA, and unjust enrichment. Finnegan asserted that far from a trade secret, Roberts’ device was in the “public domain” at the time of its disclosure to Xylem. Finnegan retained a prominent marine sanitation expert, known as the “Head Mistress” in the industry, who has for many years been a leading voice in the field of marine toilets/boat sanitation. Working with the expert, Finnegan identified third-party devices for deodorizing toilets to challenge Roberts’ claim that his device/technology was novel. From the outset, Finnegan also focused on minimizing potential damages in the case. Roberts claimed that he was entitled to a substantial reasonable royalty on future sales of his marine toilet devices. With the help of its marine sanitation expert and Xylem’s engineers, Finnegan located various third-party devices for sanitizing toilets on boats and reached out to their makers to show that the devices were not big sellers and that Roberts’ device likewise did not have the sales potential Roberts alleged. The case eventually settled to the client’s satisfaction.
Roberts v. Xylem Inc., 7:13-cv-05048, S.D.N.Y., Judge Briccetti
Finnegan trade secret case resolved with favorable summary judgment for client RichWave
RichWave Technology Corporation
Moody's Investors Service
Finnegan secures jury verdict for Philips in CD-Disc patent dispute
Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. U.S. Philips Corp.
Finnegan defends architectural work in copyright infringement case for Lessard Design
Lessard Design, Inc.
Nikon Corp. v. Sakar Int'l Inc.
Nikon Corp.
Ferring B.V. v. Allergan, Inc.
Ferring B.V.
SAIC
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.