Experience
Xerox Corporation
3Com Corp.
Xerox Corporation called on Finnegan after a district court found that 3Com/Palm’s line of personal digital assistants (commonly called “Palm Pilots”) did not infringe its patent. We secured a reversal of the district court’s claim construction, which led to a finding of infringement and entry of judgment for Xerox on remand. In a second appeal, we succeeded in obtaining an affirmance of the infringement finding.
Xerox Corporation v. 3Com Corp., 00-1464, Fed. Cir., Judges Clevenger, Mayer, Newman
Xerox Corporation v. 3Com Corp., 04-1470, Fed. Cir., Judges Bryson, Newman, Rader
Xerox Corporation
Research Corporation Technologies v. Microsoft Corp.
Research Corporation Technologies
Daicel Corporation v. Celanese International Corp.
Celanese International Corp.
Eastern District of Texas invalidates patent asserted against Finnegan client FedEx Corporation
FedEx Corp.
Loral Fairchild Corp. v. Sony Corp.
Sony Corp.
UTStarcom, Inc. v. Starent Networks Corp.
Starent Networks Corp.
FedEx Corp.
Markem-Imaje Corp. v. Zipher, Ltd.
Zipher, Ltd.; Videojet Technologies
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.