Experience
BIAX Corp.
Intel Corp.
In a case that was settled ”on the courthouse steps,” Finnegan was able to obtain for its client BIAX Corporation a favorable settlement with Intel. During claim construction, BIAX’s construction prevailed on the issues important for infringement, which helped lead to the favorable settlement.
BIAX Corp. v. Intel Corp., 2:05-cv-00184, E.D. Tex., Judges Everingham, Ward
Toyota, Subaru, Mazda
Manitto Technologies, Inc. v. Toyota Motor Corp.
Toyota Motor Corp.
Coronary Stent Visualization Corp. v. Philips Electronic North America Corp.
Philips Electronic North America Corp.
FedEx Corp.
MemSmart Semiconductor Corp. v. AAC Technologies Pte. Ltd.
AAC Technologies Pte. Ltd.
Intellectual Ventures I LLC et al. v. Toyota Motor Corp. et al.
Toyota Motor Corp. et al.
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.