Prior to the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2014 Octane Fitness decision, fee awards were seen as difficult to win and were therefore not requested nor granted often. The Octane decision stripped away rigid rules established by the Federal Circuit about when fee awards are appropriate and gave judges broad discretion to award fees when the losing party's case "stands out from others" or is litigated in an "unreasonable manner.” Since the decision, statistics show an increase in the number of fee requests and awards, which have made litigants more rigorous about presenting strong arguments. Law360 contacted Finnegan attorney Lionel M. Lavenue for this thoughts on fee awards since Octane. The effect of the Octane decision has been particularly notable with respect to non-practicing entities. Lavenue said "I think there’s no question that NPEs have changed their modus operandi. They’re being more careful now, since they know the risk is so much higher." He also said that in order to determine if it is worth the effort to seek attorneys' fees under Octane Fitness, he looks at every fee motion the judge has ruled on in the past and whether it was granted, and tries to discern what the judge considers to be an exceptional case. "That's an analysis you have to do separately and individually each time," he said. "Nobody knows exactly where that line is, and that line is different for every judge." When deciding whether to award fees, judges seem to be using criteria similar to those used to award sanctions under Rule 11 for bringing a baseless case without an adequate pre-filing investigation. Since sanctions have such harsh connotations, judges are often reluctant to impose sanctions and may be using attorneys' fees as a substitute. Lavenue said. "If they see that a case is extraordinary or even close to extraordinary, they may award fees, rather than Rule 11 sanctions."
Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), Octane Fitness LLC v. Icon Health & Fitness Inc., United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC), non-practicing entity (NPE)
Media Mention
Women in Business Law Americas Awards 2024: Three Finnegan Attorneys Shortlisted
April 7, 2024
Press Release
Finnegan and BMW Group Successfully Demolish Non-Practicing Entity NorthStar’s Efforts
April 3, 2024
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.