Experience
Uniloc USA
Microsoft Corp.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed a district court’s grant of JMOL for noninfringement, thereby reinstating the jury verdict finding that Microsoft infringed Finnegan client Uniloc USA’s patent. The Federal Circuit also affirmed the jury’s finding that Microsoft failed to prove Uniloc USA’s patent is invalid. Although the Federal Circuit also vacated the damages award as being based on a methodology the Court found to be faulty, with there no longer being any question about Microsoft’s infringement, Uniloc gained another opportunity to obtain damages from Microsoft.
Uniloc USA v. Microsoft Corp., 10-1035, -1055, -1326, Fed. Cir., Judges Linn, Moore, Rader
Federal Circuit reverses ITC finding in favor of Finnegan client John Mezzalingua Associates
John Mezzalingua Associates, Inc.
Federal Circuit rules in favor of Finnegan client in radial arm saw guard patent case
Michael S. Powell
Federal Circuit upholds enhanced damages award to Finnegan client WCM Industries
WCM Industries, Inc.
Federal Circuit rules in favor of Finnegan client InterDigital in appeal from ITC case
InterDigital Communications Corp.
Research Corporation Technologies v. Microsoft Corp.
Research Corporation Technologies
Nestle USA, Inc.
Google, Inc.
Uniloc USA, Inc. et al. v. Motorola Mobility LLC et al.
Motorola Mobility LLC et al.
Jury decision upheld by Federal Circuit for DuPont Air Products NanoMaterials
DuPont Air Products NanoMaterials, LLC
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.