直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
    • AI + Finnegan
    • Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
    • Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
    • Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
    • Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
    • Prosecution and Portfolio Management
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • Life Sciences
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • Experience

Design Rights

About

Your product designs are unique and deserve protection

Whether your business is consumer products, medical devices, pharmaceuticals, heavy equipment, apparel, sporting goods, or graphical user interfaces, when a company has invested heavily in the development of its designs, protection is critical. Your designs separate you from the competition, make your products distinctive, and help preserve your competitive advantage.

When working with a client to protect its designs, Finnegan takes the time to understand the client’s products and the significance of those products in the client’s overall business plan and the larger competitive landscape. Understanding the broader context allows us to draft and obtain stronger, more effective design rights, and to create market barriers that protect your products not only from straight “knock offs,” but also from more subtle attempts to mimic the feel of your designs.

Our experience spans the entire life of your design rights and registrations

It’s not just about getting a design patented or registered. It’s also about what to do next. From new product development through patenting, litigation, appeal, and even the sale of your portfolio, Finnegan can help. We work with innovative clients of all sizes, including Fortune 100, Global 1000, and public and private organizations across all industries, all around the world.

We represent clients on U.S. design patent matters at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and before its Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), including in post-grant reviews and interferences involving design patents—both highly specialized matters. In Europe, Finnegan represents applicants for design registration directly at the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), the United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office (UKIPO), and the German Patent and Trade Mark Office (DPMA). We also use the Hague system at the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), which enables protection to be applied for in multiple countries through a simplified filing process.

In the US, the EU, and the UK, we regularly advise clients regarding infringement, validity, and freedom to operate, and we provide comprehensive evaluation of design rights as part of intellectual property (IP) transactions. We have litigated design patent matters in U.S. district courts and before the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), and the U.S. Supreme Court. Wherever, your design protection needs take you, we have the experience to advise you along the way.

When your reach is global, protection of your design rights should extend there, too

Our offices in the United States, Asia, and Europe, and our professional relationships with more than 200 firms throughout the world, help our clients obtain protection for their product designs in domestic and international markets. We have direct experience prosecuting U.S. design patents and registering European and UK design rights for clients from across the globe. We also coordinate filings in more than twenty countries and take advantage of international filing systems, such as the Hague Agreement. And, when your rights are threatened, we have the resources to move quickly to protect your interests.

Obtain immediate protection and relief

When litigation becomes necessary to protect a client’s interests or to address a competitor’s challenge, our trial lawyers stand ready to swiftly move into action. Litigating design patent cases presents unique challenges, such as marshaling the right evidence by working closely with experts and survey evidence. Finnegan has successfully litigated dozens of cases involving all aspects of design patent law in U.S. courts and before government tribunals, including the PTAB. We also handle design validity challenges and appeals to the Boards of Appeal at the EUIPO and UKIPO as well as managing appeals to the courts in the UK and Germany.

Design rights may be only one piece of your IP puzzle

Finnegan’s experience in all areas of IP law, including utility patents, trademarks, and copyright, as well as IP aspects of advertising and trade secrets, enables us to form complementary strategies to best protect your company’s products on many fronts. Design rights are often applied for and litigated over alongside utility patents, trademarks, or trade dress, and our lawyers draw on decades of experience in these IP areas to collectively protect our clients’ interests.

Contacts

Virginia L. Carron
Partner
Atlanta, GA
+1 404 653 6452
Email
Clare A. Cornell
Partner
London
+44 (0)20 7864 2815
Email
Elizabeth D. Ferrill
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4445
Email
Douglas A. Rettew
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4161
Email
Sonja W. Sahlsten
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4329
Email
Virginia L. Carron
Partner
Atlanta, GA
+1 404 653 6452
Email
Clare A. Cornell
Partner
London
+44 (0)20 7864 2815
Email
Elizabeth D. Ferrill
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4445
Email
Douglas A. Rettew
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4161
Email
Sonja W. Sahlsten
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4329
Email

Everyone in this practice

Experience

Utility and design patent applications for brain machine interface company

Finnegan represents BrainCo, a developer of brain-machine interface (BMI) wearables that combine electroencephalography (EEG) signal processing with artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) to enable users to control electronic devices using brain signals. The firm works with BrainCo to develop and implement its intellectual property strategy, including drafting and prosecuting utility and design patent applications, in support of the company’s efforts to build a robust patent portfolio covering innovations and designs related to BMI technologies used in toys, smart home appliances, and robotic devices.

B/E Aerospace v. Safran Cabin Inc. f/k/a C&D Zodiac, Inc.
Represented B/E Aerospace in pursuing infringement claims against Safran and defending multiple post-grant challenges by Safran at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, for design of aircraft monuments. Secured favorable settlement of all claims.

2:19-cv-01480, C.D. Cal., Judge Wu

Koninklijke Philips NV f/k/a Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV v. Ideavillage Products Corp.
Representing plaintiff Koninklijke Philips NV in this multi-design patent case directed to designs for cordless shavers and nose trimmers. This case settled prior to expert discovery.

2:21-cv-08706, D.N.J., Judge McNulty

Cozy Comfort Company LLC v. Davie Clothing Proprietary Limited
Represented defendant Davie Clothing Proprietary Limited in this multi-design patent case directed to designs for oversized garments. This case favorably settled prior to discovery.

2:21-cv-00310, D. Ariz., Judge Burns

ProSlide Technology, Inc. v. WhiteWater West Industries, Ltd.
Secured jury verdict of infringement in favor of plaintiff ProSlide Technology, Inc. in litigation involving design and utility patents related to large water rides. The jury found all patents valid, and awarded monetary damages on the infringed patents, including willful infringement by two products. Post-trial, obtained a permanent injunction excluding competitor’s infringing products from the U.S. market.

6:20-cv-02189, M.D. Fla., Judge Mendoza

Closure Systems International v. Novembal USA, Inc.
Represented Novembal USA, Inc., the declaratory judgment defendant, in this multi-design patent case directed to designs for closures for bottles. This case favorably settled during discovery.

1:19-cv-03944, S.D. Ind., Judge Dinsmore

More

Insights

Articles

US Patent Office Modernizes Design Patent Examination for Computer-Generated Designs

U.S. Patent Office Modernizes Design Patent Examination for Computer-Generated Designs

March 20, 2026

Articles

Why Fashion Brands are Doubling Down on US Utility Patents

Why Fashion Brands are Doubling Down on US Utility Patents

March 10, 2026

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Federal Circuit Split over “Plainly Dissimilar” Design, Affirms Summary Judgement of Non-infringement

February 24, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Top Glory Tips the Scales: Change in Design Patent Law Overcomes Discretionary Denial in First‑of‑Its‑Kind Decision

January 27, 2026

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Federal Circuit Vacates, Reverses Patent Infringement Judgment in School Bus Sign Dispute

December 19, 2025

Seminar

U.S. Patent Application and Litigation Developments and Strategies

November 14, 2025

Virtual

More

News

Commentary

Quince Aims to Have ‘Dupe’ Evidence Shape Ugg Shoe Patent Trial

May 26, 2026

Press Release

Finnegan Enhances Its German and European IP Practice with Björn Kalbfus

April 30, 2026

Commentary

New USPTO Guidance on Design Patents for Computer-Generated Images Sparks Debate

March 18, 2026

Commentary

USPTO Has Eye on New Tech in Design Patent Guidance

March 17, 2026

Commentary

Design Patent Bar Plagued by Low Applicant Numbers Two Years In

February 27, 2026

Commentary

Design Patent Dissent Highlights Frustration Over Subjectivity

February 11, 2026

More

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP